Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §31-32-7, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 133, § 2/HB 24; Ga. L. 2008, p. 503, § 4/SB 405.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code Section 31-36-10, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Trial court properly granted summary judgment to the relative after the home healthcare agency sued the relative for a balance due on a contract the relative signed to have nursing services provided to the relative's father. The relative clearly signed in a representative capacity the contract that the home healthcare agency drafted and provided for the relative to sign, the principal, the relative's father, was clearly named in the document as such, and it was evident that the contract was substantially in the name of the principal; accordingly, there was no issue for the jury to decide because the contract obligated the father, not the relative, to pay. Associated Servs. of Accountable Prof'ls, Ltd. v. Workman, 265 Ga. App. 348, 593 S.E.2d 882 (2004) (decided under former Code Section31-36-10).
- Trial court properly denied summary judgment to the medical defendants on the immunity question under the Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care Act, O.C.G.A. § 31-32-10(a)(2), because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether the defendants made a good faith effort to rely on the directions and decisions of the patient's health care agent under the Advance Directive in carrying out the March 7 intubation. Doctors Hosp. of Augusta, LLC v. Alicea, 332 Ga. App. 529, 774 S.E.2d 114 (2015), aff'd, 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392 (Ga. 2016).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-07-05
Citation: 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 448
Snippet: instructions by a health care agent. See OCGA § 31-32-7 (a). However, [w]henever a health care provider