O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 31-7-89 (2019)

Procedure for dissolution; disposition of property

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

By joint action of the board of trustees of an authority and the governing bodies of participating units, authorities created under and pursuant to the terms of this article may be dissolved, provided that no such dissolution shall in any way impair the rights of third persons or the contracts of the authority with such third persons. Disposition to be made of the property of the authority upon dissolution shall be covered in any resolution adopted by the participating units and the board of trustees of the authority. At no time, however, shall any authority upon dissolution convey any of its property, except as may be otherwise authorized by law, to any private person, association, or corporation.

History

Ga. L. 1941, p. 241, § 13; Code 1933, § 88-1817, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, p. 499, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Cox Enters., Inc. v. Carroll City/County Hosp. Auth., 247 Ga. 39, 273 S.E.2d 841 (1981); United States v. Hosp. Auth. of Charlton County (In re Hosp.

Auth. of Charlton County), 56 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 220 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. July 3, 2012).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Open meetings and records provisions apply to hospital authorities. - Provisions for open meetings and records apply to hospital authorities. 1980 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U80-6. Upstream of surplus to ‘‘participating unit.’’ - It is implicit in the language

of O.C.G.A. § 31-7-89, and in the basic nature of the joint creation of an authority formed by two ‘‘participating units,’’ that the authority may not upstream surplus to one participating unit without the concurrence of the other. 1987 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U87-19.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Crosby v. Hosp. Auth. of Valdosta & Lowndes Cnty., 93 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1996).
Crosby v. Hosp. Auth. of Valdosta & Lowndes Cnty., 93 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1996). “O.C.G.A. § 31-7-89. Finally, the board of trustees of each authority is required to file with the governing body of the particular municipality an annual report of its activities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.