O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 31-7-90 (2019)

Annual report; budget

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The board of trustees of each authority created under this article shall file with the governing body or bodies of political subdivisions or participating units, on forms prescribed by the department, an annual report of the activities of the authority and shall annually consider and adopt as a part of such report a budget, which budget shall be filed with the annual report. The board of trustees may hold a public hearing on the budget, and representatives of any governing body within the area of operation of the authority or any other person having an interest in such budget shall have the right to be heard with respect to any matter covered by the report of the board of trustees or by the budget.

History

Ga. L. 1941, p. 241, § 14; Code 1933, § 88-1818, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, p. 499, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1996 · leading case: Crosby v. Hosp. Auth. of Valdosta & Lowndes Cnty., 93 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Crosby v. Hosp. Auth. of Valdosta & Lowndes Cnty., 93 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1996). “O.C.G.A. § 31-7-90. Dr. Crosby’s application for staff privileges was governed by the bylaws of SGMC’s medical staff (the “Bylaws”).”

Howard Ex Rel. Mullaly v. Liberty Mem'l Hosp., 752 F. Supp. 1074 (S.D. Ga. 1990). · cites it 2× “2d 89 (1978), which is autonomous from the state, submitting its annual reports and budgets to local political subdivisions, O.C.G.A. § 31-7-90 (1985), and which receives most of its funding from local taxes, O.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.