Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448If the utility does not thereafter begin removal, relocation, or adjustment within the time specified in the work plan, the department may give the utility a final notice directing that such removal, relocation, or adjustment shall commence not later than ten days from the receipt of such final notice. If such utility does not, within ten days from receipt of such final notice, begin to remove, relocate, or adjust the facility or, having so begun removal, relocation, or adjustment, thereafter fails to complete the removal, relocation, or adjustment within the time specified in the work plan, the department may exercise its right to obtain injunctive relief as provided in Code Section 32-6-175. If utility removal, relocation, or adjustment work is found necessary after the letting date of the highway improvement project, the utility shall provide a revised work plan within 30 calendar days after becoming aware of such additional work or upon receipt of the department's written notification advising of such additional work. The utility's revised work plan shall be reviewed by the department to ensure compliance with additional work.
(Code 1933, § 95A-1002, enacted by Ga. L. 1973, p. 947, § 1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 30, § 2/SB 19; Ga. L. 2008, p. 922, § 1/HB 1026.)
- For annual survey article on real property law, see 52 Mercer L. Rev. 383 (2000).
- Trial court properly found that a power company was entitled to compensation from a county for the taking of the company's private property easements, including the costs of relocating the electrical power and distribution poles, when the county widened a road because a 1929 franchise agreement did not apply to situations where the power company was forced by the county to relocate power transmission lines and poles that the company originally erected on private property easements. Clayton County v. Ga. Power Co., 340 Ga. App. 60, 796 S.E.2d 16 (2017).
Cited in Bibb County v. Georgia Power Co., 241 Ga. App. 131, 525 S.E.2d 136 (1999).
- Constitutionality of state legislation to reimburse public utilities for cost of relocating their facilities because of highway construction, conditioned upon federal reimbursement of the state under the terms of Federal-Aid Highway Act (23 U.S.C. § 123), 75 A.L.R.2d 419.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-05-03
Citation: 596 S.E.2d 589, 277 Ga. 823, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1522, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 340
Snippet: set forth for the department in Code Sections 32-6-171 and 32-6-173, except that when the removal and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-06-12
Citation: 262 Ga. 276, 417 S.E.2d 13, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1003, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 445
Snippet: conform with statutory procedures. See OCGA §§ 32-6-171; 32-6-173. Third, the ordinance’s indemnity clause