Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 32-6-70 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 32-6-70 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 32-6-70

TITLE 32 HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES, AND FERRIES

Section 6. Regulation of Maintenance and Use of Public Roads Generally, 32-6-1 through 32-6-248.

ARTICLE 3 CONTROL OF SIGNS AND SIGNALS

32-6-70. Declaration of policy.

  1. The General Assembly declares it to be the policy of this state that the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising in areas adjacent to the rights of way of roads of the state highway system, which roads are also a part of the interstate and primary systems of highways within the state, shall be regulated in accordance with the terms of this part and the regulations promulgated by the commissioner pursuant thereto and that all outdoor advertising which does not conform to the requirements of this part is a public nuisance. The General Assembly recognizes that the outdoor advertising industry is a bona fide commercial function. However, in no manner shall any outdoor advertising sign be defined as a commercial or industrial activity or be used for the purposes of administering this part. It is the intention of the General Assembly to provide a statutory basis for the regulation of outdoor advertising, such basis to be consistent with the public policy relating to areas adjacent to roads of the state highway system which also form a part of the interstate and primary systems of highways declared by the Congress in Title 23, Section 103, United States Code.
  2. The General Assembly further declares it to be the policy of this state to avert substantial economic hardship by the retention, in specific areas defined by the board, upon request made by the Department of Transportation and approved by the United States Secretary of Transportation, of directional signs, displays, and devices which were lawfully erected under state law in force at the time of their erection, which were in existence on May 5, 1976, and which do not conform to the requirements of paragraphs (1) through (5) of Code Section 32-6-72 and paragraphs (1) through (3) of Code Section 32-6-73, where it can be demonstrated that such signs, displays, and devices (1) provide directional information about goods and services in the specific interest of the traveling public and (2) are such that removal would work a substantial economic hardship in such defined area.

(Ga. L. 1967, p. 423, § 1; Ga. L. 1971, Ex. Sess., p. 5, § 1; Code 1933, § 95A-913, enacted by Ga. L. 1973, p. 947, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 1086, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 1017, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 6, § 32.)

Law reviews.

- For article, "Recommendations Regarding Control of Outdoor Advertising Along the Interstate Highway System in Georgia," see 14 Mercer L. Rev. 308 (1963). For annual survey on business corporations, see 64 Mercer L. Rev. 61 (2012). For note, "Regulation and Ownership of the Marshlands: The Georgia Marshlands Act," see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 563 (1971). For comment on State Hwy. Dep't v. Branch, 222 Ga. 770, 152 S.E.2d 372 (1966), discussing regulation of outdoor advertising and billboards as a constitutional "taking," see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 499 (1967).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

- The 1983 Constitution carried forward power exclusively in the counties and municipalities from former constitutional provisions; the Outdoor Advertising Act, O.C.G.A. § 32-6-70, does not conflict with Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Para. IV. Patrick v. Head, 262 Ga. 654, 424 S.E.2d 615 (1993).

Owner had to be in compliance with then-existing ordinance.

- Property owner did not have a vested right to erect a sign because the sign had not been erected in accordance with zoning regulations in force when the owner applied for the permit; accordingly, the owner's failure to comply with the permit rendered the owner outside of the scope of protection afforded by Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Para. IV. Although the Outdoor Advertising Control Act, O.C.G.A. § 32-6-70, also afforded protections, such protection was again not applicable to the property owner because the owner had not erected the owner's sign in compliance with the legal requirements of the existing ordinances; accordingly, the owner had no property rights in the sign. DeKalb County v. DRS Invs., Inc., 260 Ga. App. 225, 581 S.E.2d 573 (2003).

Outdoor advertising.

- O.C.G.A. § 32-6-70, in no uncertain terms, delegated the regulation of outdoor advertising to the Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) as the statute provided in part that it was the intention of the General Assembly to provide a statutory basis for the regulation of outdoor advertising, such basis to be consistent with the public policy relating to areas adjacent to roads of the state highway system, under § 32-6-70(a), and O.C.G.A. § 32-6-90 further authorized the DOT to promulgate regulations governing permits for outdoor advertising. Walker v. DOT, 279 Ga. App. 287, 630 S.E.2d 878 (2006).

Signs inside the building.

- After a company installed three signs inside the windows of a building, the superior court erred in concluding that the Georgia Outdoor Advertising Control Act (OACA), O.C.G.A. § 32-6-70 et seq., regulated the company's signs because the OACA regulated outdoor signs, and it was undisputed that the company's signs were located inside the building, and the signs could not be characterized as outdoor signs. Monumedia II, LLC v. DOT, 343 Ga. App. 49, 806 S.E.2d 215 (2017).

Cited in Moreton Rolleston, Jr. Living Trust v. DOT, 242 Ga. App. 835, 531 S.E.2d 719 (2000); Fulton County v. Action Outdoor Adver., JV, LLC, 289 Ga. 347, 711 S.E.2d 682 (2011).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 3 Am. Jur. 2d, Advertising, §§ 2, 6, 22, 23. 40 Am. Jur. 2d, Highways, Streets, and Bridges, § 324.

Outdoor Advertising Sign or Billboard as Nuisance, 37 POF2d 141.

ALR.

- Nature and extent of right granted by contract for use of wall or roof for advertising purposes, 10 A.L.R. 1108; 119 A.L.R. 1523.

Advertising rights on leased premises, 22 A.L.R. 800; 20 A.L.R.2d 940.

Constitutional power to regulate outdoor and street car advertising, 79 A.L.R. 551.

Power of highway officer in respect of billboards or other conditions on adjoining property which are deemed dangerous to travel or offensive esthetically to travelers, 81 A.L.R. 1547.

Validity and construction of statute or ordinance relating to distribution of advertising matter, 114 A.L.R. 1446.

Validity and construction of state or local regulation prohibiting the erection or maintenance of advertising structures within a specified distance of street or highway, 81 A.L.R.3d 564.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 32-6-70

Total Results: 5  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Fulton Cnty. v. Action Outdoor Advert., Jv, LLC., 711 S.E.2d 682 (Ga. 2011).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 13, 2011 | 289 Ga. 347

...[2] The trial court specifically identified one such regulation in its final order, requiring that the signs meet or exceed all structural safety and soundness requirements of OCGA § 8-2-20(9)(B), the 2006 International Building Code, with Georgia amendments. See also OCGA § 32-6-70 et seq., the Georgia Outdoor Advertising Control Act.
Copy

State v. Cafe Erotica, Inc., 507 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. 1998).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 2, 1998 | 270 Ga. 97, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 3675, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1221

...THOMPSON, Justice. The State of Georgia appeals from a ruling of the trial court striking down as violative of the right to free speech under the Federal and Georgia Constitutions, a 1996 amendment to the Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971, OCGA § 32-6-70 et seq....
...Gwinnett I Ltd. Partnership, 265 Ga. 645, 458 S.E.2d 632 (1995). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] The general declaration of policy of the regulation of outdoor advertising in areas adjacent to the state highway system is set forth at OCGA § 32-6-70....
Copy

Garden Club of Georgia, Inc. v. Shackelford, 463 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. 1995).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 6, 1995 | 266 Ga. 24

...e U.S. Secretary of Transportation); see also 23 U.S.C.A. § 131(f) (West 1990) (requiring the transportation secretary to promulgate national standards for signs within the rights-of-way near interchanges on the interstate highway system). [7] OCGA § 32-6-70 (codifying 1967 Ga.Laws, p....
Copy

Dep't of Transp. v. Shiflett, 310 S.E.2d 509 (Ga. 1984).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 4, 1984 | 251 Ga. 873

...*877 Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, David H. Flint, amicus curiae. GREGORY, Justice. This is an appeal from a judgment of Cook Superior Court declaring unconstitutional the Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971. Ga. L. 1971, p. 5 et seq. (Extraordinary Session); OCGA § 32-6-70 et seq....
Copy

Patrick v. Head, 424 S.E.2d 615 (Ga. 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 7, 1993 | 262 Ga. 654, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 157

...The Commission approved the permit and rezoned Patrick's property to permit construction of the sign. Patrick then leased the property to Adams Outdoor Advertising which applied to the DOT for a permit to construct the sign under the Outdoor Advertising Act, OCGA § 32-6-70 et seq....
...The DOT denied Adams' application for a permit on the grounds that it did not comply with the 1984 Butts County Interstate Sign Ordinance, and that the rezoning of Patrick's property had not been approved by the DOT. Two years later Patrick filed this action for declaratory judgment seeking a determination that OCGA § 32-6-70 et seq., is unconstitutional, and also seeking a determination that the 1988 Butts County ordinance which rezoned his property supersedes the 1984 Butts County Interstate Sign Ordinance. Patrick appeals from the trial court's holding that OCGA § 32-6-70 is constitutional. Butts County appeals the trial court's holding that the 1988 ordinance controls the 1984 ordinance. Case No. S92A1358 1. Patrick argues that because the 1983 Georgia Constitution failed to invest zoning power in the General Assembly, OCGA § 32-6-70, which purports to grant zoning power to the DOT, no longer has a constitutional basis....
...location and construction of advertising signs, and to enact legislation to comply with this constitutional provision. 1945 Georgia Constitution, Art. V, Sec. XI, Par. II. Subsequently, the General Assembly enacted the Outdoor Advertising Act, OCGA § 32-6-70....
...of the Constitution of 1976 in force and effect on June 30, 1983; and all laws heretofore adopted thereunder and valid at the time of their enactment shall continue in force and effect until modified or repealed. Thus, this provision carries forward from the 1976 Constitution to the 1983 Constitution the authority for OCGA § 32-6-70 et seq....