Effect of chapter upon power of Commissioner or superior courts to enforce title; construction of grants of power contained in chapter
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Nothing contained in this chapter is intended to limit or repeal any power or authority elsewhere granted the Commissioner or the superior courts in the enforcement of this title. Nor shall any grant of authority or power contained in this chapter be read to imply that such grant of authority or power was not conferred by a preexisting law.
Provident Indem. Life Ins. v. James, 506 S.E.2d 892 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2דHowever, this Court does not accept Provident’s broad interpretation of First Union as requiring every party that alleges damages resulting, at least in part, from an Insurance Code violation to pursue administrative relief prior to filing a civil complaint when the legal action…”
Griffeth v. Principal Mut. Life Ins., 533 S.E.2d 126 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2ד…Insurance Code provides a specific procedure for obtaining judicial review of the Insurance Commissioner’s actions. OCGA §§ 33-2-25 through 33-2-28.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.