O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-2-27 (2019)

Pleading and procedure of judicial review; powers of reviewing court generally

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The form of proceeding for judicial review shall be by a petition in the Superior Court of Fulton County, a copy of which shall be served upon the Commissioner immediately.

(b) The proceedings shall follow the course which is now or may hereafter be prescribed for civil actions in the superior courts, provided that the reviewing court may by order extend the time required for filing any pleadings or motions. In addition, the reviewing court may provide by order for expeditious hearing or trial of any such proceedings as justice or the public interest may require.

(c) The petition or other pleading in which judicial review shall be sought shall plainly specify the action complained of and shall set forth the relief sought and, without excessive detail, the facts and circumstances supporting the petitioner’s right to such relief.

(d) Pending judicial review pursuant to any proceeding authorized for the purpose, the Commissioner, if the action has not become effective, may postpone the effective date of the action complained of. Upon such conditions as may be required and to the extent necessary to preserve the status of proceedings or the rights of the parties or to prevent irreparable injury, in any proceeding for judicial review the reviewing court or any appellate court is authorized to issue all necessary and appropriate orders to postpone the effective date of any action or temporarily to grant or extend relief denied or withheld.

(e) Whether or not prayed for, the court may remand the matter for further proceedings or findings on terms specified by order or may require the parties to complete any record found to be inaccurate or inadequate for decision.

History

Code 1933, § 56-226, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article surveying developments in Georgia workers’ com-

pensation law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 323 (1981). For article, ‘‘Administrative Law,’’ see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 81 (2001).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Review of order on plan of conversion. - The orders encompassed by O.C.G.A. § 33-2-26 on appeals from actions of the Commissioner include hearings to determine the propriety of plans of conversion set forth in O.C.G.A.

§ 33-20-34. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ga., Inc. v. Deal, 244 Ga. App. 700, 536 S.E.2d 590 (2000). Cited in National Council on Comp. Ins. v. Caldwell, 154 Ga. App. 528, 268 S.E.2d 793 (1980).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 43 Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, § 32.

C.J.S. - 44 C.J.S., Insurance, § 70 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. v. Deal, 536 S.E.2d 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. v. Deal, 536 S.E.2d 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 6× “earning about the merger, Tiller, Deal, Lokey, and other Blue *702 Cross subscribers, all of whom had either specifically rejected the stock offering or failed to act thereon, brought a declaratory judgment action in the Superior Court of Richmond County to establish themselves…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.