
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §33-20-34, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 745, § 1.12.)
- Where plaintiffs sought an interpretation of a plan of conversion which had been reviewed and approved by the Commissioner of Insurance, the parties were required to follow the administrative review process before seeking judicial review. Cerulean Cos. v. Tiller, 271 Ga. 65, 516 S.E.2d 522 (1999).
The trial court erred in deciding the merits of a proceeding seeking an interpretation of a plan of conversion because the Commissioner of Insurance had reviewed the plan, approved it, and participated in the conversion process after approval, and the parties were required to follow the administrative review process before seeking judicial review. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ga., Inc. v. Deal, 244 Ga. App. 700, 536 S.E.2d 590 (2000).
- The orders encompassed by O.C.G.A. § 33-2-26 include hearings to determine the propriety of plans of conversion set forth in this section. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ga., Inc. v. Deal, 244 Ga. App. 700, 536 S.E.2d 590 (2000).
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by this site's author, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Title 33 in the context of Georgia insurance coverage law and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida and South Georgia. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.