Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §33-24-44.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1987, p. 1466, § 2; Ga. L. 1994, p. 344, § 1; Ga. L. 2014, p. 829, § 6/HB 645; Ga. L. 2015, p. 5, § 33/HB 90; Ga. L. 2018, p. 675, § 1/HB 878.)
The 2014 amendment, effective July 1, 2014, inserted "as provided in subsection (d) of Code Section 33-24-14" near the beginning of subsection (b).
The 2015 amendment, effective March 13, 2015, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in subsection (b).
The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, deleted "written" preceding "request" throughout subsection (a); in subsection (a), inserted "orally, electronically, or in writing" in the middle of the first sentence, and added the second and third sentences; in paragraph (a)(1), in the proviso, deleted "in writing" following "cancellation", and added "and the insurer shall document in its policy file the request for cancellation along with the date of the requested cancellation" at the end.
Insured's oral request that the policy be changed so as to delete coverage on one vehicle and extend coverage to another vehicle was in the nature of a binder and was enforceable according to the policy's terms, there being no evidence of the insured's intent or attempt to abandon or cancel the existing policy. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. v. Davis, 199 Ga. App. 598, 405 S.E.2d 529, cert. denied, 199 Ga. App. 907, 405 S.E.2d 529 (1991).
- Insured contractor, attempting to retroactively cancel the contractor's general commercial liability policy once a less expensive policy became effective, could not unilaterally effectuate the same when the contractor's employee and injured party had acquired a vested interest; the first insurer thus remained liable under O.C.G.A. § 33-24-44.1(a)(1). Harleysville-Atlantic Ins. Co. v. Queen, 250 Ga. App. 382, 552 S.E.2d 436 (2001).
- Trial court's grant of summary judgment to insurers in the insurers' declaratory judgment action, wherein it was determined that the insurers owed no coverage obligations under a motorist's mother's policy to a driver who was involved in a collision with the motorist, was proper as the motorist's mother had not cancelled the policy when she sought deletion of the motorist's vehicle therefrom and a new policy solely in the motorist's name; rather, the motorist had modified the existing policy and, accordingly, the requirements for cancellation under O.C.G.A. § 33-24-44.1(a) were inapplicable. Danforth v. Gov't Emples. Ins. Co., 282 Ga. App. 421, 638 S.E.2d 852 (2006), cert. denied, No. S07C0473, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 143 (Ga. 2007).
- What constitutes waiver by insured or insured's agent of required notice of cancellation of insurance policy, 86 A.L.R.4th 886.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15
Citation: 694 S.E.2d 337, 287 Ga. 86
Snippet: accomplished in accordance with Code Section 33-24-44.1. (g) Any unearned premium which has been paid