O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-24-59.3 (2019)

Payments sent directly to health care provider by insurer

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As used in this Code section, the term ‘‘health care insurer’’ means any insurer which issues, delivers, issues for delivery, or renews an individual or group plan, policy, or contract for health care services issued, delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed in this state by a health care corporation, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, accident and sickness insurer, fraternal benefit society, or other insurer or similar entity. It shall not, however, include a policy of insurance designed, advertised, and marketed to supplement basic health care coverage for hospital, medical-surgical, or major medical expenses so long as said supplemental insurance contract provides for payment directly to the insured.

(b) Any other provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, if a covered person provides in writing to a health care provider, whether the health care provider is a preferred provider or not, that payment for health care services shall be made solely to the health care provider and be sent directly to the health care provider by the health care insurer, and the health care provider certifies to same upon filing a claim for the delivery of health care services, the health care insurer shall make payment solely to the health care provider and shall send said payment directly to the health care provider. This subsection shall not be construed to extend coverages or to require payment for services not otherwise covered.

History

Code 1981, § 33-24-59.3, enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 1382, § 1; Ga. L. 2019, p. 386, § 65/SB 133. The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, deleted ‘‘hospital service corporation, medical service corporation,’’ following ‘‘fraternal benefit society,’’ near the end of the first sentence of subsection (a).

Annotations

The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, deleted "hospital service corporation, medical service corporation," following "fraternal benefit society," near the end of the first sentence of subsection (a).

Cross references. - Preferred provider arrangements, § 33-30-23.

Code Commission notes. - Ga. L. 1998, p. 649; Ga. L. 1998, p. 660; and Ga. L. 1998, p. 1382 each enacted a Code section designated as Code Section 33-24-59.1. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1998, the version enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 649 retained the designation as Code Section 33-24-59.1, the version enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 660 was redesignated as Code Section 33-24-59.2, and the version enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 1382 was redesignated as Code Section 33-24-59.3.

Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1998, a comma was added following "advertised" and following "medical-surgical" in the last sentence of subsection (a).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2005 · leading case: Regency Hosp. Co. v. United Healthcare of Georgia, Inc., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (N.D. Ga. 2005).
Regency Hosp. Co. v. United Healthcare of Georgia, Inc., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (N.D. Ga. 2005). · cites it 4× “) However, this statute is not mentioned anywhere in the Plaintiff's Verified Complaint nor is there any reference to the Plaintiff's alleged statutory rights.”
Regency Hosp. Co. of South Atlanta, L.L.C. v. United HealthCare Ins. Co. (N.D. Ga. 2005). · cites it 2× “Thus, the Court declines to read into the claims any allegations based upon O.C.G.A. § 33-24-59.3(b). T:\ORDERS\05\Regency Hospital\remandtwt.”
33-24-59.3(b): 2 cases
Regency Hosp. Co. v. United Healthcare of Georgia, Inc., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (N.D. Ga. 2005). “) However, this statute is not mentioned anywhere in the Plaintiff's Verified Complaint nor is there any reference to the Plaintiff's alleged statutory rights.”
Regency Hosp. Co. of South Atlanta, L.L.C. v. United HealthCare Ins. Co. (N.D. Ga. 2005). “Thus, the Court declines to read into the claims any allegations based upon O.C.G.A. § 33-24-59.3(b). T:\ORDERS\05\Regency Hospital\remandtwt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.