O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-36-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool Act.’’

History

Ga. L. 1970, p. 700, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Conex Freight Sys. v. Ga. Ins. Insolvency Pool, 254 Ga. App. 92, 561 S.E.2d 221 (2002); Lumpkin County v. Ga. Insurers Insolvency Pool, 292 Ga. 76, 734 S.E.2d 880 (2012); Pandora Franchising,

LLC v. Kingdom Retail Group, LLLP, 299 Ga. 723, 791 S.E.2d 786 (2016); Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Dubose, 349 Ga. App. 238, 825 S.E.2d 606 (2019).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Pandora Franchising, LLC v. Kingdom Retail Grp., LLLP, 791 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. 2016).
Pandora Franchising, LLC v. Kingdom Retail Grp., LLLP, 791 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “…place of business, we need not address these arguments. Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1 at p. 1096. OCGA § 9-10-91. OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq.”
Lumpkin Cnty. v. Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool, 734 S.E.2d 880 (Ga. 2012). · cites it 2× “Thereafter, the County submitted the pending claims to GIIP, a legislatively-created nonprofit entity governed by the Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool Act, OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq. (hereinafter the “Act”).”
Se. Atl. Cargo Operators, Inc. v. First State Ins., 456 S.E.2d 101 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “Midland was declared insolvent during the pendency of the litigation on the Meyer claim.”
Conex Freight Sys., Inc. v. Georgia Ins. Insolvency Pool, 561 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq. OCGA § 33-36-2. (Punctuation omitted.”
Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Exch. v. R.D. Moody & Assocs., Inc., 468 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2006). “The district court also found that FIGA and Georgia’s counterpart law, the Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool Act, O.C.G.A. §§ 33-36-1 to -19 (“GIIP”), did not differ in any way that application of FIGA would violate Georgia public policy.”
Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Hulsey Env't Servs., Inc., 748 S.E.2d 380 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq. See also Reimbursement Consul *505 tants v.”
Georgia Insurers Insol. Pool v. Brewer, 602 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 1992). “Ga. Code Ann. §§ 33-36-1 to 33-36-19 (Michie 1990).”
United States v. Rutland, Inc., 849 F. Supp. 806 (S.D. Ga. 1994). · cites it 2× “Smith entered an Order allowing GIIP to intervene as a Defendant in this action, and on November 24, 1993, GIIP filed a counterclaim and a cross-claim against the respective Parties for a declaratory judgment on their rights and liabilities under the Georgia Insurer’s Insolvency…”
Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Se. Atl. Cargo Operators, Inc., 440 S.E.2d 254 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “SEACO’s insurer was declared insolvent in May 1986, while the third-party claim was pending, so GIIP took over SEACO’s defense in accordance with the Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool Act (OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq.). GPA settled with the employee for more than $1.”
Peeples Indus., Inc. v. Parker Hannifin Corp., 377 S.E.2d 691 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq. It is undisputed that the appellants are authorized to write property and casualty insurance policies in this state and consequently are members of the Georgia pool.”
Jefferson Ins. v. Thomas, 628 S.E.2d 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 33-36-1 et seq., the “Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool Act,” was enacted as “a remedy for covered claims under property and casualty insurance policies when the insurer has become insolvent and is unable to perform its contractual obligations.”
Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Carla R. Dubose (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “When an insurance company is placed into liquidation, all existing claims of the insolvent carrier are transferred to the Pool by the liquidator and the Pool undertakes responsibility for the handling and administration of those claims in keeping with the Pool Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.