O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37 (2019)

Private cause of action not created or implied

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of this article.

History

Code 1981, § 33-6-37, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 3048, § 9.

CHAPTER 7 KINDS OF INSURANCE; LIMITS OF RISKS; REINSURANCE Sec.

Sec.

Annotations

Cross references. - Designation of classes of insurance, § 33-3-5. Insurance by employer of payment of workers’ compensation benefits to employees, § 34-9-120 et seq.

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Why Captives, Lord, What Have They Ever Done?: The Georgia Captive Insurance Company Act,’’ see 26 Ga. St. B.J. 119 (1990).

Definitions of insurance not deemed mutually exclusive. Accident and sickness insurance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: McCowan v. Progressive Preferred Ins., 618 S.E.2d 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McCowan v. Progressive Preferred Ins., 618 S.E.2d 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 16× “Since those issues have already been decided adversely to Walker, we need only reach her two remaining claims.”
Burgess v. Allstate Ins., 334 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (N.D. Ga. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 33-6-34, regarding unfair insurance claims settlement practices, contains no private cause of action”); O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37. Plaintiff has presented no evidence to support her claim for unfair claims settlement practices.”
Rodgers v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 492 S.E.2d 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 33-6-37. Therefore, we need not address Rodgers’ argument that St.”
McDavid v. McDavid (Bankr. W.D. La. 2022). · cites it 2× “” O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37. See, Matthews v. State Farm Fire & Cas.”
Barron v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (M.D. Ga. 2025). · cites it 2× “1-1 ¶¶ 33–41); see O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37 (“Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of this article.”
Donaldson (M.D. Ga. 2026). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37, however, provides that “[n]othing contained in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of [the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act].”
Brazzel (M.D. Ga. 2026). · cites it 2× “1-2 ¶ 40, at 12); see O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37 (“Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of this article.”
David L. Williams & Chong Ku Williams v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (M.D. Ga. 2026). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37, however, provides that “[n]othing contained in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of [the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act].”
First Mercury Ins. Co. v. Babcock Enter., Inc. (W.D. Ky. 2022). “See O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37 (“Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of this article.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.