O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-2-13 (2019)

Penalties for violations of chapter and for false statements under oath

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any employer or owner who violates or fails or refuses to comply with any provision of this chapter within the time prescribed or any judgment or decree made by any court in connection with the provisions

of this chapter for which no penalty has been otherwise provided shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished for each such offense by a fine of not less than $20.00 nor more than $200.00, by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (b) Any person who shall knowingly testify falsely, under oath, or shall knowingly make, give, or produce any false statements or false evidence, under oath, to the Commissioner of Labor or his authorized representatives commits the offense of perjury.

History

(Ga. L. 1937, p. 230, § 18; Ga. L. 1975, p. 198, § 3.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Offense of perjury generally, § 16-10-70. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Ga. L. 1937, p. 230, § 18 (see now O.C.G.A. § 34-2-13) is a penal section and must be strictly construed. Plummer v. State, 90 Ga. App. 773, 84 S.E.2d 202 (1954). Employer’s false statements do not support at-will employee’s wrongful discharge claim. - Although a discharged at-will city employee’s claims that the employer falsified the separation no-

tice and conspired to deceive the Department of Labor for purposes of denying the employee unemployment compensation benefits could possibly have implicated the criminal provisions of O.C.G.A. §§ 34-2-13(b) and 34-8-256(b), there was nothing in those statutes that authorized a wrongful discharge claim on that basis. Reid v. City of Albany, 276 Ga. App. 171, 622 S.E.2d 875 (2005).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–2005 · leading case: Reid v. City of Albany, 622 S.E.2d 875 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).
Reid v. City of Albany, 622 S.E.2d 875 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “And pursuant to OCGA § 34-2-13 (b), “[a]ny person who shall knowingly testify falsely, under oath, or shall knowingly make, give, or produce any false statements or false evidence, under oath, to the Commissioner *173 of Labor or his authorized representatives commits the…”
Pappas v. Hill-Staton Engineers, Inc., 358 S.E.2d 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 34-2-13. The trial court did not err in the instant case in holding that a cause of action against an employer under the Crane Act is barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.