O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-8-38 (2019)

Experience rating account

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, the term ‘‘experience rating account’’ means the individual experience of a covered employer, as determined by factors set forth in Code Sections 34-8-150 through 34-8-157.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-8-38, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 139, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1989 · leading case: Vocational Placement Servs., Inc. v. Caldwell, 308 S.E.2d 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Vocational Placement Servs., Inc. v. Caldwell, 308 S.E.2d 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “” OCGA §§ 34-8-38,34-8-39 (formerly Code Ann.”

Tanner v. Brooks, 378 S.E.2d 405 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “The administrative findings that appellee had paid Charlton “wages” within the meaning of OCGA § 34-8-51 (a) and that appellee was an “employer” within the meaning of OCGA § 34-8-38 are undisputed. Accordingly, the only issue for determination is whether there was sufficient…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.