CopyCited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 2, 1995 | 265 Ga. 790, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 3059
...provisions which are deemed to control proceedings initiated by an employer or insurer seeking reimbursement from the Fund. OCGA §
34-9-350. A recovery of attorney's fees is not expressly authorized by any provision of OCGA §
34-9-350 et seq. OCGA §
34-9-363(b) merely provides that a disputed claim for reimbursement is to "be determined in the manner provided for other workers' compensation proceedings and appeals." (Emphasis supplied.) One of the established principles of statutory construction is that the ordinary signification shall be applied to all words....
...loyer and insurer in a proceeding for workers' compensation benefits, rather than to the procedure to be followed in such a proceeding. Accordingly, the established principles of statutory construction compel the conclusion that the language of OCGA §
34-9-363(b) does not serve to incorporate the terms of OCGA §
34-9-108(b)(1) so as to authorize an award of attorney's fees in a proceeding for reimbursement against the Fund....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 1, 1996 | 471 S.E.2d 877, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2466
...On the same day, the board approved the reimbursement agreement and a week later approved the settlement agreement. The trust fund later petitioned the board to rescind the reimbursement agreement. The administrative law judge found that the employer violated OCGA §
34-9-363.1 by failing to obtain trust fund approval prior to executing the settlement agreement with the employee and ordered Altermatts to reimburse the trust fund. The board, superior court, and Court of Appeals affirmed.
OCGA §
34-9-363.1 (b) provides that an employer must obtain the trust fund’s approval for all settlement agreements with an employee “where a reimbursement agreement between the employer or the insurer and the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund exists prio...
...be confused with the agreement’s existence.6
Decided July 1, 1996.
Lowendick, Speed & Donahue, Charles G. Hoey, for appellants.
Harrison & Hop, Rita J. Llop, for appellee.
This interpretation comports with the legislative intent in enacting OCGA §
34-9-363.1....
...not obligated to pay the employer under the reimbursement agreement.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
See Altermatts Painting v. Subsequent Injury Trust Fund,
219 Ga. App. 357, 359-360 (464 SE2d 922) (1995).
OCGA §
34-9-350.
OCGA §
34-9-363.1.
See Bekaert Steel Wire Corp....