O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-364 (2019)

Apportionment or denial of reimbursement for expenses paid by employer or insurer

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The administrator of the fund may apportion or deny the employer or insurer reimbursement from the fund for medical expense provided by Code Section 34-9-360 where there are clear and unequivocal facts to establish that the subsequent injury to the permanently impaired employee was not caused by or in any way related to the employee’s preexisting disability. The apportionment by the administrator shall be subject to the approval of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation.

History

(Code 1933, § 114-913, enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 608, § 1.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Administrative law judge was correct in declining to apply O.C.G.A. § 34-9-364, which would have required apportionment of medical expenses resulting from the merger of the preexisting and subsequent injuries when there were clear and unequivocal facts to establish that the subsequent injury to the permanently impaired employee was not caused by or in any way related to the employee’s

preexisting disability. Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Knight Ridder Newspapers-Macon Tel. & News, 203 Ga. App. 458, 416 S.E.2d 887 (1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1084, 113 S. Ct. 1061, 122 L. Ed. 2d 366 (1993). Cited in Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Knight-Ridder Newspapers-Macon Tel. & News, 207 Ga. App. 368, 427 S.E.2d 844 (1993).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1993 · leading case: Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Knight Ridder Newspapers-Macon Tel. & News, 416 S.E.2d 887 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).
Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Knight Ridder Newspapers-Macon Tel. & News, 416 S.E.2d 887 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 8× “Reimbursement by SITF was ordered and the ALJ declined to apply OCGA § 34-9-364, which would have required apportionment of medical expenses resulting from the merger of the preexisting and subsequent injuries “where there are clear and unequivocal facts to establish that the…”
Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Knightridder Newspapers-Macon Tel. & News, 427 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “However, the ALJ specifically declined to order apportionment of medical expenses pursuant to OCGA § 34-9-364. The full board adopted the decision of the ALJ but added that the SITF “is not liable for reimbursement of those medical expenses which are caused solely by, or related…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.