O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-31-5 (2019)

Certificate of existence of minimum standards; manner of determination; disposition and evidentiary effect of certificate

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every local law granting an original municipal charter shall have attached thereto a certificate by the author of the bill stating that the minimum standards required by this chapter exist as to the area embraced. Existence of the standards may be determined, as to population, by estimate based on the number of dwellings in the area multiplied by the average family size in the area, as determined by the last preceding federal census or by other reliable evidence acceptable to the author. As to development of the area, existence of the standards may be determined by estimate based on actual survey, county maps or records, aerial photographs, or some other reliable map acceptable to the author. The certificate shall be a permanent part of the charter and shall constitute conclusive evidence of the existence of the standards required by this chapter.

History

Ga. L. 1963, p. 251, § 5.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc., 293 Ga. 19, 743 S.E.2d 381 (2013). RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 62 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 24.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc., 743 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. 2013).
City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc., 743 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “Thus, municipal charter provisions regulating the making of city contracts have the same legal effect as the statutory requirements that govern county contracting, and the premise on which the Court of Appeals relied to distinguish this case from PMS Construction was incorrect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.