O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-36-110 (2019)

Applicability

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The procedures of this article shall apply to all annexations pursuant to this chapter but shall not apply to annexations by local Acts of the General Assembly.

History

Code 1981, § 36-36-110, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 292, § 2/HB 2.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Validity of proposed annexation not justiciable. - City was not prevented from adopting an annexation ordinance by the statutory process of O.C.G.A. § 36-36-110 et seq., that in the absence of a declaration regarding the ordinance’s alleged unconstitutionality was required to be completed before the city attempted

to exercise the city’s legislative power of annexation, because the parties agreed the process did not apply; therefore, the city’s mere proposal of annexation, and the county’s objection, did not present a justiciable controversy. Fulton County v. City of Atlanta, 299 Ga. 676, 791 S.E.2d 821 (2016).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Fulton Cnty. v. City of Atlanta, 791 S.E.2d 821 (Ga. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fulton Cnty. v. City of Atlanta, 791 S.E.2d 821 (Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “Current OCGA § 36-36-11 (a) provides that land use disputes related to annexation are governed by Article 7, OCGA § 36-36-110 et seq. The City’s notice of its proposed annexation expressed its intention to adopt similar land use and zoning restrictions to those of the County,…”
Coweta Cnty. v. City of Newnan (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 16× “The County filed an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, seeking to enjoin the City from finalizing the annexation without first resolving the County’s objection through the dispute resolution process set forth in OCGA § 36-36-110 et seq., but the City…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.