Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448It shall be the duty of the judge of the probate court or county governing authority to compel the treasurers of the county to come before the court or governing authority at such times as may be designated by the judge or governing authority, not less than twice in each year, to render an account of his official actings and doings respecting the county tax and funds and to make a full and complete exhibit of his books, vouchers, accounts, and all things pertaining to his office.
(Ga. L. 1882-83, p. 82, § 1; Civil Code 1895, § 418; Civil Code 1910, § 527; Code 1933, § 23-1024; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 36.)
- Under former Civil Code 1910, §§ 527 and 528 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 36-6-22 and36-6-23), the board of commissioners of roads and revenues has authority to require the tax collector to appear before the board at stated times to render an account of the collector's official actings. Edmondson v. Glenn, 153 Ga. 401, 112 S.E. 366 (1922).
In a proceeding under former Civil Code 1910, § 527 (see O.C.G.A. § 36-6-22) or former Civil Code 1910, § 528 (see O.C.G.A. § 48-5-140), the ordinary (now judge of the probate court) acted in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. Riner v. Flanders, 173 Ga. 43, 159 S.E. 693 (1931).
Total Results: 9
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-06-03
Citation: 829 S.E.2d 160
Snippet: issue $ 35 million in revenue bonds under OCGA § 36-62-2 (6) (N) to finance a retail development in east
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-27
Snippet: exemption from ad valorem taxes. See OCGA §§ 36-62-3, 36-62-2 (6) (H) (vi), (J) and (K).
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-27
Citation: 296 Ga. 793, 770 S.E.2d 832, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 192
Snippet: property. See OCGA §§ 36-62-3, *798 36-62-2 (6) (H) (vi) and (J). Woodham designates these
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Snippet: the Developmental Authorities Law. See OCGA § 36-62-2 (6) (H) (i) (“‘Project’ includes . . . [t]he
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179
Snippet: the Developmental Authorities Law. See OCGA § 36-62-2 (6) (H) (i) (“ ‘Project’ includes . . . [t]he acquisition
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-02-04
Citation: 559 S.E.2d 440, 274 Ga. 733, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 343, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 50
Snippet: proper "project" for a bond referendum under OCGA § 36-62-2. 271 Ga. at 408, 519 S.E.2d 665. [4] Ga. Const
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-07-08
Citation: 519 S.E.2d 665, 271 Ga. 403, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2504, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 659
Snippet: the statutory definition of projects in OCGA § 36-62-2 (6). There are two paragraphs on which the trial
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-06-19
Citation: 357 S.E.2d 62, 257 Ga. 181, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 785
Snippet: “convention facility” within the meaning of OCGA § 36-62-2 (6) (H) (ii) and (vi). The appellant points out
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-07-08
Citation: 305 S.E.2d 110, 251 Ga. 248, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 789
Snippet: authorized by the Development Authorities Law, § OCGA 36-62-2 (6) (K) (Code Ann. § 69-1509b), was an eligible