O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-6-3 (2019)

Form of oath

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the oath required of all public officers, before entering on the duties of their office, county treasurers must take the following oath: ‘‘I, , do swear that I will faithfully collect, disburse, and account for all moneys or other effects of the county, and otherwise faithfully discharge all the duties required of me by law as county treasurer. So help me God.’’

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 522; Code 1868, § 586; Code 1873, § 548; Code 1882, § 548; Civil Code 1895, § 454; Civil Code 1910, § 570; Code 1933, § 23-1004; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 36.

Annotations

Cross references. - Oaths required of public officers generally, T. 45, C. 3.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 63C Am. Jur. 2d, Public Officers and Employees, § 124.

C.J.S. - 67 C.J.S., Officers and Public Employees, §§ 70, 71, 72.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: York v. Athens Coll. of Ministry, Inc., 821 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

York v. Athens Coll. of Ministry, Inc., 821 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Although the trial court recited the language of OCGA § 36-66-3 (4) (E), it appears to have mistakenly referred to the statute as "OCGA § 36-6-3 (4) (E)," which does not currently exist in the Georgia Code.”

Kevin York v. Athens Coll. of Ministry, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Thus, the appellants argue that the trial court erred in granting ACM’s and the County’s motions to dismiss.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.