CopyCited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 4, 1994 | 441 S.E.2d 406, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1052
...Nalley III purchased a 12.196-acre *129 tract in Cobb County. Located on that tract is a 0.196-acre cemetery that contains approximately 52 grave sites, 11 with inscriptions. In January 1992, Nalley applied for a permit to remove and relocate the cemetery pursuant to OCGA §
36-72-5 and Chapter 3-8.5 of the Code of Cobb County. Pursuant to OCGA §§
36-72-5 (4) and
36-72-6, Nalley identified and notified the descendants of those buried in the cemetery, the appellants here, who have since opposed Nalley's permit application....
...The superior court judge conducted an evidentiary hearing of the descendants' de novo appeal and found that the cemetery is a "family/neighborhood" cemetery, that Nalley is the title owner of the property and that Nalley's application met the mitigation and notice requirements of OCGA §
36-72-5 (4) and (5)....
...*130 In Georgia, an owner of land who dedicates that land to public use is prohibited from afterwards appropriating the land to private purposes if exercise of those private rights would materially affect the accommodation of the public rights in the property. OCGA §
44-5-230. Under OCGA §
36-72-5 an applicant for a permit to move a cemetery must submit evidence of ownership of the land in the form of a title opinion....
...inion concerning the weight of the evidence for that of the factfinder. 2. The descendants also challenge the sufficiency of Nalley's application because Nalley proposed a change subsequent to the Cemetery *131 Preservation Commission's report. OCGA §
36-72-5 sets out the minimum requirements for an application. The court found that Nalley's application contained all of the elements required under §
36-72-5....