Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448shall obtain approval by resolution and referendum as provided in this Code section prior to issuing bonds for any new buildings, facilities, or real property or improvements to existing buildings, facilities, or real property and shall be bound to such resolution as provided in subsection (b) of this Code section.
(Code 1981, §36-75-11, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 421, § 1/HB 181; Ga. L. 2010, p. 4, § 2/HB 203.)
The 2010 amendment, effective May 7, 2010, substituted "bonds" for "bonded indebtedness" in the middle of subsection (a); substituted the present provisions of subsection (b) for the former provisions, which read: "If a public safety and judicial facilities authority created and activated by a single county pursuant to this chapter desires to fund multiple projects in a bond issue, such projects shall be ranked in the order they will be funded after approval by the governing authority and ratification by the electors under this Code section. Such order of funding shall be binding on the public safety and judicial facilities authority and such projects shall be funded in the order approved unless a different order is submitted to the governing authority for approval and electors for ratification."; in subsection (c), substituted "issue bonds" for "incur bonded indebtedness" near the beginning of paragraph (c)(1), and in the ending undesignated paragraph, substituted "buildings, facilities, or real property" for "buildings or facilities" twice and added "and shall be bound to such resolution as provided in subsection (b) of this Code section" at the end; and added subsections (d) and (e).
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2007, "May 24, 2007" was substituted for "the effective date of this Code section" in subsection (a).
- War on Terrorism Local Assistance Act, O.C.G.A. § 36-75-1 et seq., is not unconstitutional because the Act does not violate the uniform terms and conditions provision for development authorities in Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. VI, Para. III; the uniformity required by Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. VI, Para. III in the laws creating development authorities is the same uniformity required by Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. IV(a) in laws of a general nature. Dev. Auth. v. State, 286 Ga. 36, 684 S.E.2d 856 (2009).
- War on Terrorism Local Assistance Act, specifically O.C.G.A. § 36-75-11(c), is not unconstitutional because the classification in § 36-75-11 is not unreasonable and arbitrary since the classification applies in precisely the same way and without exception to every county development authority throughout the state that currently meets or may, in the future, meet the criteria set forth in § 36-75-11(c); the purpose of § 36-75-11 is to protect against the accumulation of excessive bonded indebtedness, and the legislature had a reasonable basis to first address this critical financial situation in counties. Dev. Auth. v. State, 286 Ga. 36, 684 S.E.2d 856 (2009).
Legislation enacting the War on Terrorism Local Assistance Act, Ga. L. 2003, p. 862, does not violate Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. IV because the legislation and O.C.G.A. § 36-75-11(c) are logically related and do not embrace discordant subjects when the legislation generally pertains to public safety and judicial facilities authorities, and § 36-75-11(c) applies to authorities in counties that have activated public safety and judicial facilities authorities; it was the legislature's decision to enact a statute imposing a referendum requirement on any authority that has been authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in a county with an activated public safety and judicial facilities authority when that authority has constructed or operates buildings or facilities for use by a department, agency, division, or commission of such county. Dev. Auth. v. State, 286 Ga. 36, 684 S.E.2d 856 (2009).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-09-28
Citation: 684 S.E.2d 856, 286 Ga. 36, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3050, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 479
Snippet: rejection of their constitutional challenges to OCGA § 36-75-11(c), which imposes a referendum requirement on