O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-81-1 (2019)

Legislative intent

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The intent of this article is to provide minimum budget, accounting, and auditing requirements for local governments so as to provide local taxpayers with an opportunity to gain information concerning the purposes for which local revenues are proposed to be spent and are actually spent and to assist local governments in generally improving local financial management practices while maintaining, preserving, and encouraging the principle of home rule over local matters. It is the further intent of this article to provide a mechanism through which appropriate information may be collected to assist state and local policy makers in carrying out their lawful responsibilities. It is also the intent of this article to provide for the collection and reporting of information so as to assist local taxpayers and local policy makers in understanding and evaluating local government service delivery and operations.

History

Ga. L. 1980, p. 1738, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 36; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1575, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2000 · leading case: Eley v. Greene Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 372 S.E.2d 231 (Ga. 1988).
Eley v. Greene Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 372 S.E.2d 231 (Ga. 1988). · cites it 10× “The trial court denied the application, finding that the Board's method of publishing the monthly statement was within the commissioner's discretion.”
Sexton v. Clayton Cnty. Tax Digest, 529 S.E.2d 149 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “However, when evidence is introduced that challenges the correctness of the millage rate and the evidence shows without dispute that the duty was not performed, the presumption has been rebutted, and the undisputed evidence controls. Todd v. State, 205 Ga. 363, 365-366 (1) ( 53…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.