Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1878-79, p. 40, § 3; Code 1882, § 508k; Civil Code 1895, § 379; Civil Code 1910, § 442; Code 1933, § 87-203; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 57; Ga. L. 1984, p. 1362, § 2.)
- Ga. L. 1984, p. 1362, § 8, not codified by the General Assembly, provided: "The provisions of this Act [which amended this Code section] shall be liberally construed to effect the purposes hereof, and insofar as the provisions of this Act may be inconsistent with the provisions of the Georgia Constitution under circumstances where the General Assembly has been granted the power by law to enlarge or restrict such provisions of the Constitution or the provisions of any law, including any general, local, or special Act of the General Assembly creating or activating any municipality, this Act shall control."
- Former Civil Code 1910, § 442 (see O.C.G.A. § 36-82-3) gave express authority to issue bonds when the notice required by former Civil Code 1910, § 440 (see O.C.G.A. § 36-82-1) was given and the election held in accordance with former Civil Code 1910, § 441 (see O.C.G.A. § 36-82-2). Cowart v. City of Waycross, 159 Ga. 589, 126 S.E. 476 (1925).
This section must be given effect, subject to the change as made by Ga. Const. 1976, Art. IX, Sec. VIII, Para. I (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. VI, Para. I), in reference to the proportion of qualified voters necessary to authorize a bond issue; and no further enabling Act is necessary. McKnight v. City of Decatur, 200 Ga. 611, 37 S.E.2d 915 (1946) (see O.C.G.A. § 36-82-3).
- County may issue bonds to be paid for with funds derived from public taxation, and procure a judgment of the court confirming and validating the bonds, only when the Constitution and laws of the state have been fully complied with. Richter v. Chatham County, 146 Ga. 218, 91 S.E. 35 (1916).
- After the bonds have been validated, a provision for an annual tax must be made before the bonds can be sold and the debt be thereby actually incurred. Woodall v. Town of Adel, 122 Ga. 301, 50 S.E. 102 (1905); Oliver v. City of Elberton, 124 Ga. 64, 52 S.E. 15 (1905).
- Voters cannot authorize a bond issued for past indebtedness of a municipality. The voters must pass on the debt to be incurred. Mayor of Macon v. Jones, 122 Ga. 455, 50 S.E. 340 (1905).
- It is lawful to make the proposed bonds "payable in gold, or lawful money of the United States, at the option of the holder." Heilbron v. Mayor of Cuthbert, 96 Ga. 312, 23 S.E. 206 (1895).
School bond issue requires assent consisting of simply majority of those qualified voters in school bond election. 1963-65 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 769.
- 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Securities and Obligations, §§ 139 et seq., 164.
- 64A C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, §§ 2153 et seq.
- Estoppel to deny validity of municipal bonds issued under an unconstitutional statute, 37 A.L.R. 1310.
Negotiability of municipal bonds as affected by reference to fund from which they are to be paid, 42 A.L.R. 1027.
Right to call governmental bonds in advance of their maturity, 109 A.L.R. 988.
Effect of delay after authorization by voters on power of governmental unit to issue bonds, 135 A.L.R. 768.
Validity, within authorized debt, tax, or voted limit, of bond issue in excess of amount permitted by law, 175 A.L.R. 823.
Rescission of vote authorizing school district or other municipal bond issue, expenditure, or tax, 68 A.L.R.2d 1041.
No results found for Georgia Code 36-82-3.