Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1937, p. 761, § 6; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 36.)
- For comment on Smith v. Hospital Auth., 210 Ga. 801, 82 S.E.2d 827 (1954), see 17 Ga. B.J. 258 (1954).
- When revenue anticipation bonds are provided for and validated for a particular purpose, the proceeds thereof constitute a trust fund which cannot be diverted from such purpose and applied to some other purpose. Smith v. Hospital Auth., 210 Ga. 801, 82 S.E.2d 827 (1954), for comment, see 17 Ga. B.J. 258 (1954).
- Covenants against leasing or otherwise disposing of an undertaking, revenues of which are pledged in accordance with the contract between a governing authority and the authority's bondholders under the Revenue Bond Law (O.C.G.A. Art. 3, Ch. 82, T. 36), constitute a contract between such governing body and each bondholder which is enforceable by the latter under the provisions of this section. Hicks v. State, 99 Ga. App. 302, 108 S.E.2d 187 (1959) (see O.C.G.A. § 36-82-65).
Cited in Miller v. Head, 186 Ga. 694, 198 S.E. 680 (1938); Johnson v. State, 107 Ga. App. 16, 128 S.E.2d 651 (1962).
- 64A C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, §§ 2135, 2136, 2184 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-02-13
Citation: 265 Ga. 24, 453 S.E.2d 8, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 549, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 68
Snippet: into a sinking fund created pursuant to OCGA § 36-82-65 (a) (3). Although the Authority presumably could