Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-82-76 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 82 information not found

ARTICLE 3 REVENUE BONDS

36-82-76. Notice of hearing on validation.

Prior to the hearing of the case, the clerk of the superior court of the county in which it is to be heard shall publish, once during each of the two successive weeks immediately preceding the week in which the hearing is to be held, a notice to the public that on the day specified in the order providing for the hearing of the case the same will be heard. Such publication shall be in the newspaper which is the official organ of the county in which the sheriff's advertisements appear.

(Ga. L. 1937, p. 761, § 12; Ga. L. 1966, p. 48, § 1.)

Law reviews.

- For note, "Procedural requirements for public approval of tax-exempt industrial development bonds under TEFRA", 19 Ga. St. B.J. 84 (1982).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

- See Lawson v. City of Moultrie, 194 Ga. 699, 22 S.E.2d 592 (1942).

Notice sufficient.

- Although a scrivener's error stated that the hearing would regard the validation of a bond issued by the county industrial building authority, because the notice made clear that it was meant to refer to a case involving the airport authority, not the industrial building authority, the notice of the bond validation hearing was sufficient as the record supported a finding of substantial compliance. Avery v. State of Ga., 295 Ga. 630, 761 S.E.2d 56 (2014).

Cited in Darby v. City of Vidalia, 75 Ga. App. 804, 44 S.E.2d 454 (1947); Dade County v. State, 77 Ga. App. 139, 48 S.E.2d 144 (1948); Youngblood v. State, 259 Ga. 864, 388 S.E.2d 671 (1990).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Securities and Obligations, § 357.

C.J.S.

- 64A C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, §§ 2135, 2136, 2139 et seq.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 36-82-76 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 8

Savage v. State of Georgia

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-29

Citation: 297 Ga. 627, 774 S.E.2d 624

Snippet: preceding two weeks, on June 27 and July 4. See OCGA § 36-82-76 (requiring that notice informing the public of

Cottrell v. Atlanta Development Authority, D/B/A Invest Atlanta

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Snippet: 2014 and February 14, 2014 as required by OCGA § 36-82-76. Rev. William L. Cottrell, Sr., Mamie Lee Moore

COTTRELL Et Al. v. ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Et Al.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179

Snippet: February 14, 2014 as required by OCGA § 36-82-76. Rev. William L. Cottrell, Sr., Mamie Lee Moore

Avery v. State of Georgia

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-06-30

Citation: 295 Ga. 630, 761 S.E.2d 56, 2014 WL 2925147, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 547

Snippet: given for the bond validation hearing. OCGA § 36-82-76 provides: Prior to the hearing of [a bond

Sherman v. City of Atlanta

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-06-17

Citation: 293 Ga. 169, 744 S.E.2d 689, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1818, 2013 WL 2927578, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 556

Snippet: the hearing was given to the public. See OCGA § 36-82-76. A bond validation hearing is an evidentiary hearing

Ambac Indemnity Corp. v. Akridge

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-02-05

Citation: 425 S.E.2d 637, 262 Ga. 773, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 480, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 190

Snippet: immediately preceding the hearing. See OCGA § 36-82-76. The advertisement satisfied the constitutional

Youngblood v. State of Ga.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-02-15

Citation: 388 S.E.2d 671, 259 Ga. 864

Snippet: Foster argues that the notice provisions of OCGA §§ 36-82-76; 36-82-77 (a) are insufficient to meet the requirements

CHARLTON DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. Charlton County

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-07-02

Citation: 317 S.E.2d 204, 253 Ga. 208, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 853

Snippet: adverse judgment could have been appealed. OCGA §§ 36-82-76, 36-82-77 and 36-82-78; Miller v. Columbus, 229