Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The powers conferred by this article shall be in addition and supplemental to, and not in substitution for, the powers conferred by any other general, special, or local law. The limitations imposed by this article shall not affect the powers conferred by any other general, special, or local law. Bonds may be issued under this article without regard to any other general, special, or local law. The General Assembly declares its intention that the limitations of the amount or percentage of, and the restrictions relating to, indebtedness of a governmental body and the incurring thereof contained in the Constitution of this state and in any general, special, or local law shall not apply to bonds and the issuance thereof under this article.
(Ga. L. 1937, p. 761, § 19.)
- For article, "Selected Oddities in Georgia Municipal Law," see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 783 (1975).
- Revenue Bond Law (O.C.G.A. Art. 3, Ch. 82, T. 36) does not purport to be a general law exhaustive of the purposes for which revenue bonds or certificates may be issued and this is not violative of a constitutional provision that laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation throughout the state, and no special law shall be enacted in any case for which provisions have been made by an existing general law (Ga. Const. 1976, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. VII (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. IV)). Sigman v. Brunswick Port Auth., 214 Ga. 332, 104 S.E.2d 467 (1958).
- Provisions of the Municipal Electric Authority Act (O.C.G.A Art. 3, Ch. 3, T. 46) are not unlawful as being contrary to provisions of the Revenue Bond Law (O.C.G.A Art. 3, Ch. 82, T. 36). Thompson v. Municipal Elec. Auth., 238 Ga. 19, 231 S.E.2d 720 (1976).
- Bonds issued for financing certain income producing projects and payable solely from income produced thereby shall not be considered as debts within the meaning of the debt clause, Ga. Const. 1976, Art. IX, Sec. VII, Para. I (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. V, Para. I). City of Valdosta v. Singleton, 197 Ga. 194, 28 S.E.2d 759 (1944).
Cited in Sherman v. City of Atlanta, 317 Ga. 345, 730 S.E.2d 113 (2013).
- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, § 395.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-06-17
Citation: 293 Ga. 169, 744 S.E.2d 689, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1818, 2013 WL 2927578, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 556
Snippet: of Atlanta. See generally OCGA §§ 36-82-60 to 36-82-85 (the “Revenue Bond Law”). However, at the bond
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-06-03
Citation: 293 Ga. 268, 744 S.E.2d 26, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1686, 2013 WL 2372192, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 493
Snippet: with the Revenue Bond Law, OCGA §§ 36-82-60 to 36-82-85, the Fulton County District Attorney filed a petition
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-07-08
Citation: 519 S.E.2d 665, 271 Ga. 403, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2504, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 659
Snippet: OCGA § 50-15-2. Id. See OCGA §§ 36-82-60 to 36-82-85 (1993). See Ebon Foundation v. Oatman, 269