Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-91-20 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 36-91-20 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 36-91-20

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 91 information not found

ARTICLE 2 CONTRACTING AND BIDDING REQUIREMENTS

36-91-20. Written contract required; advertising; competitive sealed bidding; timing of addendums; prequalification.

  1. All public works construction contracts subject to this chapter entered into by a governmental entity with private persons or entities shall be in writing and on file and available for public inspection at a place designated by such governmental entity. Municipalities and consolidated governments shall execute and enter into contracts in the manner provided in applicable local legislation or by ordinance.
    1. Prior to entering into a public works construction contract other than those exempted by Code Section 36-91-22, a governmental entity shall publicly advertise the contract opportunity. Such notice shall be posted conspicuously in the governing authority's office and shall be advertised in the legal organ of the county or by electronic means on an Internet website of the governmental entity or any appropriate Internet websites identified by the governmental entity which shall include the Georgia Procurement Registry as provided by Code Section 50-5-69, provided that such posting is at no cost to the governmental entity.
    2. Contract opportunities that are advertised in the legal organ shall be advertised a minimum of two times, with the first advertisement occurring at least four weeks prior to the opening of the sealed bids or proposals. The second advertisement shall follow no earlier than two weeks from the first advertisement.
    3. Contract opportunities that are advertised solely on the Internet shall be posted continuously for at least four weeks prior to the opening of sealed bids or proposals. Inadvertent or unintentional loss of Internet service during the advertisement period shall not require the contract award or bid or proposal opening to be delayed.
    4. Contract opportunities that will be awarded by competitive sealed bids shall have plans and specifications available on the first day of the advertisement and shall be open to inspection by the public. The plans and specifications shall indicate if the project will be awarded by base bid or base bid plus selected alternates and:
      1. A statement listing whether all anticipated federal, state, or local permits required for the project have been obtained or an indication of the status of the application for each such permit including when it is expected to be obtained; and
      2. A statement listing whether all anticipated rights of way and easements required for the project have been obtained or an indication of the status as to when each such rights of way or easements are expected to be obtained.
    5. Contract opportunities that will be awarded by competitive sealed proposals shall be publicly advertised with a request for proposals which request shall include conceptual program information in the request for proposals describing the requested services in a level of detail appropriate to the project delivery method selected for the project.
    6. The advertisement shall include such details and specifications as will enable the public to know the extent and character of the work to be done.
    7. All required notices of advertisement shall also advise of any mandatory prequalification requirements or pre-bid conferences as well as any federal requirements pursuant to subsection (d) of Code Section 36-91-22. Any advertisement which provides notice of a mandatory pre-bid conference or prequalification shall provide reasonable advance notice of said conference or for the submittal of such prequalification information.
  3. Governmental entities are authorized to utilize any construction delivery method, provided that all public works construction contracts subject to the requirements of this chapter that:
    1. Place the bidder or offeror at risk for construction; and
    2. Require labor or building materials in the execution of the contract

      shall be awarded on the basis of competitive sealed bidding or competitive sealed proposals. Governmental entities shall have the authority to reject all bids or proposals or any bid or proposal that is nonresponsive or not responsible and to waive technicalities and informalities.

  4. No governmental entity shall issue or cause to be issued any addenda modifying plans and specifications within a period of 72 hours prior to the advertised time for the opening bids or proposals, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. However, if the necessity arises to issue an addendum modifying plans and specifications within the 72 hour period prior to the advertised time for the opening of bids or proposals, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, then the opening of bids or proposals shall be extended at least 72 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, from the date of the original bid or proposal opening without need to readvertise as required by subsection (b) of this Code section.
  5. Bid and contract documents may contain provisions authorizing the issuance of change orders, without the necessity of additional requests for bids or proposals, within the scope of the project when appropriate or necessary in the performance of the contract. Change orders may not be used to evade the purposes of this article.
  6. Any governmental entity may, in its discretion, adopt a process for mandatory prequalification of prospective bidders or offerors; provided, however, that:
    1. Criteria for prequalification must be reasonably related to the project or the quality of work;
    2. Criteria for prequalification must be available to any prospective bidder or offeror requesting such information for each project that requires prequalification;
    3. Any prequalification process must include a method of notifying prospective bidders or offerors of the criteria for or limitations to prequalification; and
    4. Any prequalification process must include a procedure for a disqualified bidder to respond to his or her disqualification to a representative of the governmental entity; provided, however, that such procedure shall not be construed to require the governmental entity to provide a formal appeals procedure. A prequalified bidder or offeror can not be later disqualified without cause.

(Code 1981, §36-91-20, enacted by Ga. L. 2000, p. 498, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 820, § 12; Ga. L. 2007, p. 640, § 2/SB 146; Ga. L. 2018, p. 926, § 2/HB 489.)

The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, in paragraph (b)(1), in the second sentence, substituted "or any appropriate Internet websites identified by the governmental entity which shall" for "or an Internet website identified by the governmental entity which may" in the middle, and added ", provided that such posting is at no cost to the governmental entity" at the end.

Law reviews.

- For survey article on local government law, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 263 (2008).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

School board acted within the board's authority in furthering intent of § 36-91-21. - Trial court properly relied solely on the court's determination that an unsuccessful bidding contractor would unlikely prevail on the merits of the contractor's suit in denying the contractor's petition for an interlocutory injunction and vacation of the court's temporary restraining order as: (1) the school board acted within the board's powers in accepting, albeit late, the lowest bidder's list of subcontractors; and (2) the board was authorized to find that the bid provision requiring that a list of subcontractors be provided with a bid was immaterial and could be waived. R. D. Brown Contrs., Inc. v. Bd. of Educ. of Columbia County, 280 Ga. 210, 626 S.E.2d 471 (2006).

Mandamus.

- Based on the Georgia legislature's explicitly stated intention in the Georgia Local Government Public Works Construction Law, O.C.G.A. § 36-91-1 et seq., that local laws and ordinances controlled the manner of the city's execution of and entry into contracts, a contractor was not entitled to a writ of mandamus requiring the city to execute a contract in the city's favor, as neither the mayor nor the city council exercised their discretionary authority to approve any award that might or might not have resulted from the competitive sealed proposals process. Duty Free Air & Ship Supply Co./Franklin Wilson Airport Concession, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 282 Ga. 173, 646 S.E.2d 48 (2007).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 36-91-20

Total Results: 2  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

R. D. Brown Contractors, Inc. v. Bd. of Educ., 626 S.E.2d 471 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 13, 2006 | 280 Ga. 210, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 443

......" OCGA § 36-91-2(12) defines "responsive bidder" as "a person or entity that has submitted a bid or proposal that conforms in all material respects to the requirements set forth in the invitation for bids or request for proposals." [4] Finally, OCGA § 36-91-20(c) states that "[g]overnmental entities shall have the authority to reject any and all bids or proposals and to waive technicalities and informalities." "`This Court is to construe [statutes] to give sensible and intelligent effect to all...
...bidder as one whose bid "conforms in all material respects to the requirements set forth in the invitation for bids...." (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 36-91-2(12). The reference to "material respects" must be honored. Similarly, the provision of OCGA § 36-91-20(c) that governments "have the authority to reject any and all bids or proposals and to waive technicalities and informalities," must be given effect; to read OCGA § 36-91-21(b)(4) to mean that all terms stated in the invitation for bids...
...whose bid conforms to the invitation for bids "in all material respects." Clearly, some provisions of a bid may be considered immaterial, and constitute the sort of "technicalities and informalities" that the governmental entity can waive under OCGA § 36-91-20(c)....
Copy

Duty Free Air & Ship Supply Co. v. City of Atlanta, 646 S.E.2d 48 (Ga. 2007).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 14, 2007 | 282 Ga. 173, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1462

...The Construction Law explicitly contemplates the joint application of its terms with local law and ordinances. It states unequivocally: "Municipalities and consolidated governments shall execute and enter into contracts in the manner provided in applicable local legislation or by ordinance. " (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 36-91-20(a)....
...o the level of a creating a mockery because "the City . . . arbitrarily refuses to prepare, and the Mayor refuses to sign [the] contract." These accusations are both inappropriate and wholly unnecessary given the explicit legislative mandate of OCGA § 36-91-20(a)....
...Indeed, the City defended its selection of DFASS for well over a year during the pendency of the appeals process, although this fact is ignored by the majority. The only provision of the Construction Law, OCGA §§ 36-91-1 et seq., other than OCGA § 36-91-20(a), that the majority even mentions is OCGA § 36-91-21(c)(1)(C), which it summarily treats as subordinate to OCGA § 36-91-20(a)....
...Because the City has, in writing, selected DFASS as the responsible and responsive offeror whose proposal is most advantageous, the City "shall . . . [m]ake an award" to DFASS. This mandatory, substantive language is not vitiated by the fact that, in OCGA § 36-91-20(a), the Construction Law permits local legislation or ordinances to provide for the manner of execution and entry into public works construction contracts....
...the substantive formation of the agreement itself. At the end of its opinion, the majority makes the unsupported assumption that the Construction Law was merely intended to complement local laws. Unlike the majority opinion, however, nothing in OCGA § 36-91-20(a) authorizes ordinances to conflict with or prevail over the Construction Law, or to control formation of the contract....
...of its rights to the completed contract by the City's purported cancellation. Several provisions of law refer to the routine reservation of the right to reject all proposals or cancel an invitation prior to official acceptance of any proposal. OCGA § 36-91-20(c); City Charter § 6-402(c); City Code § 2-1194....