Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §36-91-73, enacted by Ga. L. 2000, p. 498, § 1; Code 1981, §36-91-93, as redesignated by Ga. L. 2001, p. 820, § 12.)
- Subcontractor, that received a transfer of funds by or on behalf of the debtor as the general contractor, argued the subcontractor's potential claim under O.C.G.A. § 36-91-93 of the Georgia Little Miller Act against the payment bond precluded the bankruptcy trustee from avoiding the transfer as a preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547, as constituting contemporaneous new value. The subcontractor also argued the funds were held in constructive trust, were earmarked, or were paid in the ordinary course of business. Watts v. Pride Util. Constr., Inc. (In re Sudco, Inc.), Bankr. (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Sept. 27, 2007).
- In an action on a public works payment bond under O.C.G.A. §§ 36-91-92 and36-91-93, a trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a surety because a material issue of fact existed as to whether a general contractor complied with the notice of commencement requirements so as to fall under the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-91-93(a)(2), or whether the general contractor received a sub-subcontractor's request but failed to comply and thus fell under the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 36-91-93(a)(1). Southway Crane & Rigging v. Fed. Ins. Co., 294 Ga. App. 504, 669 S.E.2d 482 (2008).
No results found for Georgia Code 36-91-93.