O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 37-1-26 (2019)

Sale of surplus products

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The department shall sell, to the best advantage, all surplus products of the Central State Hospital or other institutions under the control and supervision of the department and shall apply the proceeds thereof to the maintenance of the institution from which such surplus products are received. Should any surplus funds arise from this source, they shall be paid into the state treasury annually; and the department shall, at the end of each quarter, make a detailed report of all such transactions to the Governor.

(b) It is not the intention of this Code section to encourage competition in any way by the state, its institutions, agencies, departments or branches, or other subdivisions with the individual, private farmers of this state, or others, in the production and sale of agricultural or industrial commodities or products in due course of commerce.

History

Code 1981, § 37-1-26, enacted by Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 3-1/HB 228.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Baldwin Cnty. v. Dep't of Behavioral Health & Developmental Disabilities for the State of Georgia (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baldwin Cnty. v. Dep't of Behavioral Health & Developmental Disabilities for the State of Georgia (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “25 See OCGA § 37-1-26 (a) (“The department shall sell, to the best advantage, all surplus products of the Central State Hospital or other institutions under the control and supervision of the department and shall apply the proceeds thereof to the maintenance of the institution…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.