O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 37-4-44 (2019)

Periodic review of individualized program plan; discharge or transfer to another facility upon change in client’s needs; notice of discharge or transfer

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Article 3 Placement, Transfer, and Transportation of Developmentally Disabled Persons Undergoing Habilitation, Generally Article 2 Procedures for Obtaining Services from the Department PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 37-4-20 through 37-4-22 [Repealed].

PART 2 COURT ORDERED SERVICES Filing petition with court for Designation of facility to which client to be admitted; transfers of clients between private and state owned facilities; transfers of clients generally. Transportation of clients generally. Transfer of clients to custody of federal agencies for services; retention of jurisdiction over clients by state courts; jurisdiction over developmentally dis- Sec.

abled persons in federal hospitals and institutions located in state. Procedure for transfer of Georgia residents from out-of-state facilities to Georgia facilities. Procedure upon discovery that a client receiving court ordered services from a Georgia facility is not a resident. Article 4 Payment of Expenses of Care and Transportation of Developmentally Disabled Persons Undergoing Habilitation, Generally Effect of inability to pay on right to habilitation services. Liability for expenses for transporting, examining, and caring for clients. Payment of expenses incurred in connection with hearings held under this chapter. Article 5 Sec.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1988–1988 · leading case: Robbins v. Lumpkin, 370 S.E.2d 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).
Robbins v. Lumpkin, 370 S.E.2d 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “[conducting a full and fair] hearing, the hearing examiner may issue any order which the court is authorized to issue under subsection (f) of Code Section 37-4-40, provided that the hearing examiner may order the client’s continued habilitation for a period not to exceed one…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.