O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 4-4-96 (2019)

Applicability of article to anthrax and brucellosis

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall apply to the control and, if possible, the eradication of anthrax and brucellosis as well as to the eradication of bovine tuberculosis.

History

(Ga. L. 1937, p. 591, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 4 Am. Jur. 2d, Animals, § 27 et seq.

C.J.S. - 3B C.J.S., Animals, § 130 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Town of Smyrna v. Mun. Gas Auth., 129 F. Supp. 3d 589 (M.D. Tenn. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Smyrna v. Mun. Gas Auth., 129 F. Supp. 3d 589 (M.D. Tenn. 2015). “That said, it very well may be that the Gas Authority did not knowingly do anything wrong. It claims it had no motive to defraud because it holds property for the benefit of the public, its assets belong to its members pursuant to O.”
— 4-4-96(a)(3) — 1 case
Town of Smyrna v. Mun. Gas Auth., 129 F. Supp. 3d 589 (M.D. Tenn. 2015). “That said, it very well may be that the Gas Authority did not knowingly do anything wrong. It claims it had no motive to defraud because it holds property for the benefit of the public, its assets belong to its members pursuant to O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.