Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §40-6-16, enacted by Ga. L. 2003, p. 427, § 1; Ga. L. 2006, p. 231, § 2/SB 64; Ga. L. 2011, p. 593, § 1/HB 156; Ga. L. 2016, p. 61, § 1/HB 767.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, substituted the present provisions of the introductory paragraph of subsection (c) for the former provisions, which read: "The operator of a motor vehicle approaching a stationary towing or recovery vehicle or a stationary highway maintenance vehicle that is displaying flashing yellow, amber, or red lights shall approach the vehicle with due caution and shall, absent any other direction by a peace officer, proceed as follows:"; substituted "recovery, highway maintenance, or utility service vehicle" for "recovery, or highway maintenance vehicle" in paragraph (c)(1); designated the existing provisions of subsection (d) as paragraph (d)(1); deleted "or (c)" following "subsection (b)" in paragraph (d)(1); added paragraph (d)(2); and added subsection (e).
- Payment of indemnification or disability of emergency personnel or prison guards, § 45-9-85.
- For note on the 2003 enactment of this Code section, see 20 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 213 (2003).
- Because the defendant's apparent violation of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-16(a) (now subsection (b)) gave the investigating officer a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant and inquire further, the trial court erred in granting the defendant's motion to suppress a refusal to take a breath test in connection with DUI charges; moreover, the trial court erroneously concluded that the defendant could have had an innocent explanation for a last-minute swerve to avoid hitting the officer's patrol car as the issue went to the question of guilt or innocence and was not the dispositive question on a motion to suppress. State v. Rheinlander, 286 Ga. App. 625, 649 S.E.2d 828 (2007).
- Defendant's motion for directed verdict of acquittal on a violation of Georgia's "move-over" statute, O.C.G.A. § 40-6-16(a) (now subsection (b)), was properly denied because a reasonable jury could find that, although a patrol car was moving at the time the defendant nearly struck the car, the car had been stationary with lights flashing, and the defendant had failed to slow down or move over. Van Auken v. State, 304 Ga. App. 802, 697 S.E.2d 895 (2010).
Evidence that the defendant passed the officer in a lane adjacent to the officer while the officer conducted a traffic stop and had the officer's blue emergency lights activated, and that the defendant had room to move out of the adjacent lane and safely into a farther lane was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for violation of the Spencer Pass Law, O.C.G.A. § 40-6-16. Pierce v. State, 322 Ga. App. 145, 743 S.E.2d 438 (2013).
Cited in Stevenson v. City of Doraville, 294 Ga. 220, 751 S.E.2d 845 (2013).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-11-25
Citation: 294 Ga. 220, 751 S.E.2d 845, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 3652, 2013 WL 6188123, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 999
Snippet: requirements of Georgia’s “move-over” law, OCGA § 40-6-16.4 There is no record evidence, however, which shows