O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 40-6-182 (2019)

Establishment of state speed zones

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever the commissioner of public safety or the commissioner of transportation shall determine upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any maximum speed set forth in this article is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist at any intersection or other place or upon any part of the state highway system, they may jointly determine and declare a reasonable and safe maximum speed limit at such place, which shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected. Such a maximum speed limit may be declared to be effective at all times as are indicated upon such signs; and differing limits may be established for different times of day, different varying weather conditions, and other factors bearing on safe speeds, which shall be effective when posted upon appropriate fixed or variable signs. In no case shall the maximum speed limit for any highway be established at higher than the maximum speed limits set forth in Code Section 40-6-181 for that type of highway.

History

(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 49; Ga. L. 1957, p. 419, § 1; Ga. L. 1963, p. 254, § 2; Code 1933, § 68A-803, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 1582, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 5.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 68-301 are included in the annotations for this Code section. Setting speed limits was quasi-legislative activity. - In a case in which a parent filed a wrongful death action against the Georgia Department of Transportation alleging that the Department’s negligence in choosing to set the speed limit along a certain stretch of high-

way at 50 miles per hour led to the death of the parent’s child, the trial court erred in denying the Department’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of sovereign immunity under O.C.G.A. § 50-21-24(5) given that: (1) O.C.G.A. § 40-6-182 provided that the Georgia Commissioner of Public Safety and the Commissioner of the Georgia Transportation Department could set the speed limit on any part of the state highway system based on the conditions in that area; (2)

the Department’s participation in setting the speed limit pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 40-6-182 was quasi-legislative action, as it entailed adopting rules and was analogous to the legislative activity of making of laws; and (3) pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-21-24(5), the Department could not be held liable for losses resulting from such quasi-legislative action. DOT v. Watts, 260 Ga. App. 905, 581 S.E.2d 410 (2003). School zones outside municipal limits. - There is no statutory provision authorizing the establishment of school zones, as such, or restricting the speed of motor vehicles therein, outside the corporate limits of municipalities. Whitley Constr. Co. v. Price, 89 Ga. App. 352, 79 S.E.2d 416 (1953) (decided under former Code 1933, § 68-301). Factors in determining whether speed limit reduced. - Whether the speed limit has been reduced depends upon whether action has been taken by a governing authority and proper notice

posted on the highway. Harper v. Brown, 122 Ga. App. 316, 176 S.E.2d 621 (1970). Signs designating zones need not be erected personally by commissioners. - There is no requirement that the physical erection of the signs giving notice of designated speed zones be done by the commissioner of public safety or the commissioner of transportation personally, rather than through an agent. Munday v. Brissette, 113 Ga. App. 147, 148 S.E.2d 55, rev’d on other grounds, 222 Ga. 162, 149 S.E.2d 110 (1966). Sufficient evidence to find defendant drivers negligent. - Under an application of the rules of law to the facts, the jury was authorized to find from the evidence adduced upon the trial, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, that the defendant drivers were grossly negligent in causing the plaintiff ’s injuries. Lawrence v. Hayes, 92 Ga. App. 778, 90 S.E.2d 102 (1955). Cited in Frasard v. State, 322 Ga. App. 468, 745 S.E.2d 716 (2013).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Section constitutional. - Permitting the Department of Public Safety (now Commissioner of Public Safety) to fix special speed restrictions, within an authorized maximum, on any segment of a

public street or highway, based upon an engineering or traffic survey, is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. 1945-47 Op. Att’y Gen. p. 408.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, § 265 et seq. ALR. - Right of way at street or highway intersections, 37 A.L.R. 493; 47 A.L.R. 595.

Necessity and propriety of instruction as to prima facie speed limit, 87 A.L.R.2d 539.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1991–2014 · leading case: Nye v. State, 631 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).
Nye v. State, 631 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 12× “Nye contends that the trial court should have dismissed the speeding charge against him, because the accusation accused him of *348 violating OCGA § 40-6-182, which simply provides that the commissioner of public safety or the commissioner of transportation can determine the…”
Young v. Griffin, 765 S.E.2d 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 10× “In the charge, the trial court recited verbatim the following portions of OCGA § 40-6-140: (a) Whenever any person driving a vehicle approaches a railroad grade crossing, such driver shall stop within 50 feet but not less than 15 feet from the nearest rail of such railroad and…”
Dep't of Transp. v. Watts, 581 S.E.2d 410 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “6 But the Code section goes on to provide that the speed limits which it sets forth may be altered as authorized in OCGA § 40-6-182. 7 OCGA § 40-6-182 provides that the commissioner of public safety and the commissioner of the transportation department may set the speed limit on…”
Frasard v. State, 745 S.E.2d 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 7× “” See OCGA §§ 40-6-182, 40-6-183 (a); Dept. of Transp.”
Reid v. City of Hogansville, 413 S.E.2d 457 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 7× “” OCGA § 40-6-182 specifies, in pertinent part, that “[w]henever the commissioner of public safety or the commissioner of transportation shall determine upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any maximum speed set forth in this article is greater or less…”
Dep't of Transp. v. Mikell, 493 S.E.2d 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 40-6-182 also addresses the changing of speed limits in Georgia, and like the MUTCD, it also requires that an engineering and traffic investigation be conducted prior to making any change.”
United States v. Acosta, 807 F. Supp. 2d 1154 (N.D. Ga. 2011). · cites it 2× “(b) Consistent with the provision of engineering and traffic investigations regarding maximum speed limit as provided in Code Section 40-6-182, no person shall drive a vehicle at a speed in excess of the following maximum limits: .”
Michael C. Frasard v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 7× “” See OCGA §§ 40-6-182, 40-6-183 (a); Dept. of Transp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.