O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 42-2-12 (2019)

Reasonableness of rules and regulations

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All rules and regulations enacted by the board under the authority of this chapter must be reasonable.

History

Ga. L. 1956, p. 161, § 12.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 73 C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, § 171 et seq. ALR. Censorship of convicted prisoners’ “legal” mail, 47 A.L.R.3d 1150.

Censorship of convicted prisoners’ “nonlegal” mail, 47 A.L.R.3d 1192. Validity and construction of prison regulation of inmates’ possession of personal property, 66 A.L.R.4th 800.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2013 · leading case: Bryson v. State, 638 S.E.2d 181 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bryson v. State, 638 S.E.2d 181 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “2 In contrast, the current version of OCGA § 42-2-12, enacted in 2006, provides that if a sexual offender changes his or her residence address, the sexual offender shall give the information to the sheriff of the county with whom the sexual offender last registered within 72…”
Hill v. Owens, 738 S.E.2d 56 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 42-2-12 (emphasis supplied). We understand this reasonableness requirement regarding such rules to include decisions regarding what rules not to adopt, particularly where, as here, the grant of authority to adopt such rules is a general delegation on unlimited subject…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.