O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-15-1 (2019)

Short title and purpose

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Act of 2021” and is enacted to safeguard life, health, and property and to promote the public welfare.

History

Ga. L. 1937, p. 294, § 1; Ga. L. 1945, p. 294, § 2; Code 1933, § 84-2101, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 1048, § 1; Ga. L. 2018, p. 583, § 1/SB 425; Ga. L. 2022, p. 604, § 1/HB 476. The 2022 amendment, effective May 9, 2022, inserted “shall be known and may

be cited as the ‘Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Act of 2021’ and”.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2018, p. 583, § 1/SB 425, effective July 1, 2018, reenacted this Code section without change.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Limitation of liability provision did not violate public policy. - Limitation of liability provision contained in a contract between a real estate developer and an engineering firm was enforceable because the provision represented a reasonable allocation of risks in an arms-length business transaction and did not violate the public policy underlying O.C.G.A. § 13-8-2(a) or the public policy for professional engineering practice set forth in O.C.G.A. § 43-15-1 et seq.; the limitation of liability provision did not release the firm from liability for the firm’s engineer-

ing errors because the firm remained liable to the developer for the firm’s errors up to $50,000, and although the provision capped the firm’s liability, the firm remained substantially responsible for the firm’s professional errors and retained the incentive to perform engineering services with due regard for the safety, health, and welfare of the public. RSN Props. v. Eng’g Consulting Servs., 301 Ga. App. 52, 686 S.E.2d 853, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 1314 (2009), cert. denied, No. S10C0519, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 249 (Ga. Mar. 15, 2010).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Constitutionality of statute regulating

land surveyors or civil engineers, 55 A.L.R. 307.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2009 · leading case: McEver v. Planners & Engineers Collaborative, Inc., 663 S.E.2d 240 (Ga. 2008).
McEver v. Planners & Engineers Collaborative, Inc., 663 S.E.2d 240 (Ga. 2008). · cites it 12× “With that purpose in mind, the legislature saw fit to require "professional engineers" to meet a host of requirements, including having at least a four-year degree in an accredited engineering curriculum, acquiring a certain number of years of engineering experience, and passing…”
RSN Props., Inc. v. Eng'g Consulting Servs., Ltd., 686 S.E.2d 853 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “In this case, a real estate developer (RSN) and an engineering firm (ECS) — parties in relatively equal bargaining positions in a commercial setting — contracted for the provision of professional engineering services necessary for a residential development.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.