O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 43-34-100 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Physician Assistant Act.’’
History
Ga. L. 1972, p. 676, § 1; Ga. L. 2009, p. 859, § 1/HB 509.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 272 Ga. 404, 528 S.E.2d 785 (2000). RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 70 C.J.S., Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Health-Care Providers, § 1 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 520 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 520 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “Since 1986, he has been certified in accordance with the Physician's Assistant Act, OCGA § 43-34-100 et seq., and he is authorized to assist Dr.”
Beall v. Curtis, 603 F. Supp. 1563 (M.D. Ga. 1985). “The practice of physician’s assistants is governed by statute, Official Code of Georgia Annotated §§ 43-34-100 to -108.”
Rockefeller v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 554 S.E.2d 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). “Love & Willingham, Jonathan C. Peters, Jason B.”
Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 528 S.E.2d 785 (Ga. 2000). “The General Assembly enacted the Physician’s Assistant Act, OCGA § 43-34-100 et seq., “to encourage the more effective utilization of the skills of physicians by enabling them to delegate health *405 care tasks to [physician’s assistants] where such delegation is consistent with…”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh, 317 Ga. 769 (Ga. 2023). “The petitioner, whose husband died after a medical procedure the physician assistant helped with, asked us to review the Court of Appeals’ holding below that the Physician Assistant Act (“PAA”), OCGA § 43-34-100 et seq., does not “create[ ] vicarious lia- bility for supervising…”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh (Ga. 2023). “The petitioner, whose husband died after a medical proce- dure the physician assistant helped with, asked us to review the Court of Appeals’ holding below that the Physician Assistant Act (PAA), OCGA § 43-34-100 et seq., does not “create[] vicarious liabil- ity for supervising…”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). “The Northside defendants contend that the trial court erred by finding that the Physician Assistant Act (“PAA”), OCGA § 43-34-100 et seq., creates vicarious liability for physicians for the conduct of physician assistants they supervise.”
Jacqueline Statham v. David S. Quang (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). “890 , 894 (1) ( 884 SE2d 563 ) (2023), in examining vicariously liability under the Physician Assistant Act (“PAA”), OCGA § 43-34-100 et seq., 12 [t]he General Assembly is presumed to have been aware of existing law, including vicarious liability principles, when it enacted the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.