O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-34-102 (2019)

(See Editor’s notes.) Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this article, the term:

(1) ‘‘Applicant’’ means an individual seeking licensure as a physician assistant pursuant to this article.

(2) ‘‘Alternate supervising physician’’ means a physician to whom a board approved primary supervising physician has delegated the responsibility of supervising a physician assistant who is licensed to that primary supervising physician and who agrees to supervise the physician assistant for the primary supervising physician and who is on record with the board.

(3) ‘‘Board’’ means the Georgia Composite Medical Board.

PHYSICIANS, ASSISTANTS, & OTHERS

(4) ‘‘Job description’’ means a document, signed by the primary supervising physician and the physician assistant, in which the primary supervising physician delegates to that physician assistant authority to perform certain medical acts and which describes the professional background and specialty of the primary supervising physician and the qualifications including related experience of the physician assistant; and includes a general description of how the physician assistant will be utilized in the practice. A job description shall not be required to contain every activity the physician deems the physician assistant qualified to perform but shall confine the activities of the physician assistant to those in the scope of practice of the primary supervising physician.

(5) ‘‘Order’’ means to prescribe pursuant to a job description which drug, medical device, medical treatment, or diagnostic study is appropriate for a patient and to communicate the same in writing, orally, via facsimile, or electronically.

(6) ‘‘Physician’’ means a person lawfully licensed in this state to practice medicine and surgery pursuant to Article 2 of this chapter.

(7) ‘‘Physician assistant’’ means a skilled person who is licensed to a supervising physician and who is qualified by academic and practical training to provide patients’ services not necessarily within the physical presence but under the personal direction or supervision of the supervising physician.

(8) ‘‘Prescription drug order’’ means a written or oral order of a physician assistant for a drug or medical device for a specific patient. Such term includes an electronic visual image prescription drug order and an electronic data prescription drug order.

(9) ‘‘Primary supervising physician’’ means the physician to whom the board licenses a physician assistant pursuant to a board approved job description and who has the primary responsibility for supervising the practice of a physician assistant pursuant to that physician assistant’s job description.

History

Ga. L. 1972, p. 676, § 3; Ga. L. 1995, p. 827, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1043, § 1; Ga. L. 2004, p. 581, § 1; Ga. L. 2009, p. 859, § 1/HB 509.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - For application of this statute in 2021, see Executive Order 01.22.21.07.

Law reviews. - For note on 1995 amendments of this Code section and § 43-34-103, see 12 Georgia St. U.L. Rev. 301 (1995).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Central Anesthesia Assocs. v. Worthy, 254 Ga. 728, 333 S.E.2d 829 (1985); Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C.

v. Gillis, 272 Ga. 404, 528 S.E.2d 785 (2000).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2023 · leading case: Cent. Anesthesia Assocs., P.C. v. Worthy, 333 S.E.2d 829 (Ga. 1985).
Cent. Anesthesia Assocs., P.C. v. Worthy, 333 S.E.2d 829 (Ga. 1985). · cites it 4× “CAA also contends that OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (4) and 43-34-103 (d), defining and setting out the duties of a physician’s assistant, show that CAA met the supervision requirement.”
Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 528 S.E.2d 785 (Ga. 2000). · cites it 6× “OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (5), 43-34-103 (a). The Act establishes an application procedure to be followed to obtain approval by the Composite State Board of Medical Examiners, the board charged with overseeing PAs, for the performance of specific medical tasks set forth in the proposed…”
Cent. Anesthesia Assocs. P. C. v. Worthy, 325 S.E.2d 819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (4) and 43-34-103. Additionally, he is to perform only those tasks in his job description plus those performed under the direct supervision and in the presence of the physician utilizing him, OCGA § 43-34-105.”
Rockefeller v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 554 S.E.2d 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “10 OCGA § 43-34-102 (2). 11 173 Ga. App. 150 ( 325 SE2d 819 ) (1984), aff'd, supra, 254 Ga.”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh, 317 Ga. 769 (Ga. 2023). · cites it 6× “OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (4); 43-34-103 (a) (2).”
Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 520 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “” OCGA § 43-34-102 (5). Plaintiffs first enumerate the grant of partial summary judgments as to the claim of battery because neither plaintiff would have consented to surgery performed by a physician’s assistant.”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh (Ga. 2023). · cites it 6× “OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (4); 43-34-103 (a) (2).”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 6× “OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (5), 43-34-103 (a). The Act establishes an application procedure to be followed to obtain approval by the [Georgia Composite Medical Board], the board charged with overseeing PAs, for the performance of specific medical tasks set forth in the proposed PA’s job…”
— 43-34-102(5) — 1 case
Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 520 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “” OCGA § 43-34-102 (5). Plaintiffs first enumerate the grant of partial summary judgments as to the claim of battery because neither plaintiff would have consented to surgery performed by a physician’s assistant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.