O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-34-104 (2019)

Notice of application approval or disapproval; issuance of license

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Within a reasonable time after receipt of the documents required by this article, the board shall give to the applicant written notice of approval or disapproval of the physician assistant’s application; and, if approval of the application is given, the board shall issue to the assistant a license authorizing the assistant to perform medical tasks under the direction and supervision of the physician.

(b) The board shall not approve an application unless it finds from the information forwarded with the application that the applicant has complied with the requirements in this article.

History

Ga. L. 1972, p. 676, § 5; Ga. L. 1997, p. 935, § 4; Ga. L. 2009, p. 859, § 1/HB 509.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 272 Ga. 404, 528 S.E.2d 785 (2000).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 528 S.E.2d 785 (Ga. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 528 S.E.2d 785 (Ga. 2000). · cites it 2× “he board, of the proposed [PA’s] qualifications,” OCGA § 43-34-102 (3); to approve or disapprove a proposed PA’s application and issue licenses authorizing a PA to perform medical tasks under the direction and supervision of the utilizing physician, with the strict statutory…”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh, 895 S.E.2d 256 (Ga. 2023). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 43-34-104 (a). 2 act for him or subsequently ratifies the acts of another in his behalf”) with OCGA §§ 43-34-102 (7) (a physician assistant is “qualified .”
Carole Maso v. Brian Zeh, 895 S.E.2d 256 (Ga. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 43-34-104 (b). 3 id. § 43-34-105 (“[A] physician assistant, under the direction of the applying physician, may perform the tasks described in the job de- scription” and additional tasks “performed under the direct supervi- sion and in the presence of the physician utilizing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.