CopyCited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 1, 2001 | 553 S.E.2d 594, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2931
CARLEY, Justice.
S.W.A.N. Consulting & Security Services, Inc. (SWAN) is a private detective and security agency, and is properly licensed pursuant to OCGA §
43-38-1 et seq., the “Georgia Private Detective and Security Agencies Act” (Act), and all applicable state regulations....
...ipality or county, from imposing local regulations upon any street patrol, special officer, or person furnishing street patrol service, including regulations requiring registration with an agency to be designated by such municipality or county.
OCGA §
43-38-14 (c)....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 1, 2001 | 274 Ga. 277
...Morchower, Chagay Weiss, Rajan Bhandari, Atlanta, for appellant. Peevy & Lancaster, Gregory W. Lancaster, Lawrenceville, for appellee. CARLEY, Justice. S.W.A.N. Consulting & Security Services, Inc. (SWAN) is a private detective and security agency, and is properly licensed pursuant to OCGA §
43-38-1 et seq., the "Georgia Private Detective and Security Agencies Act" (Act), and all applicable state regulations....
...ipality or county, from imposing local regulations upon any street patrol, special officer, or person furnishing street patrol service, including regulations requiring registration with an agency to be designated by such municipality or county. OCGA §
43-38-14(c)....
...eral law in order for the general law to pre-empt the local ordinance. Since there is no evidence that the City's ordinance at issue directly conflicts with the general law enacted by the General Assembly regulating private security businesses (OCGA §
43-38-1 et seq.), the City's ordinance is not preempted by the general law....