O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 44-10-23 (2019)
Exemptions
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Cities or counties which have adopted ordinances relative to planning and zoning for historic purposes as of March 31, 1980, under authority granted by a local constitutional amendment or by any other means, including cities or counties which have subsequently replaced or amended in whole or in part such ordinances, shall not be required to comply with this article and are authorized to create and regulate historic districts, zones, or sites pursuant to their existing local historic preservation ordinances.
History
Ga. L. 1980, p. 1723, § 12; Ga. L. 1989, p. 1160, § 1.
Annotations
Law reviews. For note on 1989 amendment to this
Code section, see 6 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 173 (1989).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2002–2002 · leading case: M. Wayne Robinson Builder-Dev., Inc. v. City of Rome, 564 S.E.2d 526 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).
M. Wayne Robinson Builder-Dev., Inc. v. City of Rome, 564 S.E.2d 526 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). “OCGA § 44-10-23 (exempting cities and counties that had adopted such ordinances prior to March 31, 1980).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.