Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Proprietors of planing mills and other similar establishments shall have the same lien as provided in Code Section 44-14-363 for work done on material furnished by others; and, when they furnish material, they shall have the same liens provided for in Code Section 44-14-361 for materialmen. Proprietors of sawmills, when furnishing material for the improvement of real estate to purchasers from them for that purpose, shall be entitled to the lien provided for in Code Section 44-14-361, said lien to be governed by the rules laid down in Code Section 44-14-361 when the same are applicable.
(Ga. L. 1873, p. 42, § 10; Code 1873, § 1983; Code 1882, § 1983; Civil Code 1895, § 2807; Civil Code 1910, § 3356; Code 1933, § 67-2204.)
Sawmill is within meaning of words "other similar establishments." Newman v. Cash, 47 Ga. App. 39, 169 S.E. 520 (1933).
- Assertion of a lien by retention of the property, under O.C.G.A. § 44-14-513, is not shown where lumber is hauled from the plaintiff's sawmill and placed on the right of way of the railroad for the defendant. Daniel v. Blackwell, 30 Ga. 786, 119 S.E. 447 (1923).
- The proprietor of a sawmill as well as a planing mill has a lien under O.C.G.A. § 44-14-513 on the product of the mill for work done on material furnished by others. Murphey v. McGough, 105 Ga. 816, 31 S.E. 757 (1898).
- The proprietor of a sawmill who makes a contract to saw the lumber of another, and substantially complies with the contract, is entitled to a lien, but not otherwise. Hawkins v. Chambliss, 116 Ga. 813, 43 S.E. 55 (1902).
- In order for the proprietor of a sawmill to acquire a lien upon the lumber sawed under a contract with the owner of the lumber, after the lumber sawed has been surrendered to the owner thereof, it is necessary for the proprietor to file and record a lien within ten days from the time of the completion of the work. Richardson v. Mallory, 13 Ga. App. 496, 79 S.E. 362 (1913); Jones v. Newsome, 27 Ga. App. 386, 108 S.E. 558 (1921).
- A city court has jurisdiction to foreclose a lien in favor of the proprietor of a sawmill on the product of the mill, for work done on material furnished by another, at least where the principal of the amount claimed does not exceed the jurisdiction of the county court. Chambliss v. Hawkins, 123 Ga. 361, 51 S.E. 337 (1905).
Cited in Young v. Alford, 36 Ga. App. 708, 137 S.E. 914 (1927).
No results found for Georgia Code 44-14-513.