Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 67-1305.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1967, p. 737, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 976, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 859, § 2.)
A joint payee request did not constitute an assignment of FHA's security deed for the reason that it did not identify such security deed and did not purport to be signed by the grantee. Washington Loan & Banking Co. v. Guin, 236 Ga. 779, 225 S.E.2d 318 (1976).
- After Chapter 7 debtor executed a note to a lender and also executed a security deed to a grantee, as the lender's nominee, to secure the debt, there was no separation of the note and security deed as a matter of law resulting from the transfer of the security deed. Drake v. Citizens Bank (In re Corley), 447 Bankr. 375 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2011).
- Because a debtor filed a second bankruptcy petition for the express purpose of delaying and frustrating the legitimate efforts of a secured creditor to enforce its right of foreclosure, the debtor was found to have not acted in good faith under 11 U.S.C. § 362(g); thus, cause existed to annul or lift the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d). GRP Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Olsen (In re Olsen), Bankr. (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Jan. 8, 2007).
- Foreclosure sale was valid because there was no defect in the assignment of the power of sale from the nominee to the lender when the security deed did not lack any essential terms regarding the nominee's role, rights, or duties under O.C.G.A. § 10-6-1 and no consideration was needed under O.C.G.A. § 44-14-64(a). The lender did not violate the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) by recording the sale post-petition because the Chapter 13 debtor retained no interest in the property after the sale. Bishop v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re Bishop), 470 Bankr. 633 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2011).
- Under O.C.G.A. §§ 23-2-114 and44-14-64(b), the assignments of plaintiff homeowner's security deed granted to defendant bank did not diminish the deed's powers in the bank's foreclosure action, thus, the homeowner's wrongful foreclosure claim failed to state a claim for relief. Milani v. OneWest Bank FSB, F.3d (11th Cir. Oct. 17, 2012)(Unpublished).
District court properly dismissed the plaintiff's suit against multiple financial institutions and fictitious parties seeking declaratory and equitable relief to stop foreclosure proceedings as there was no dispute that the holder of the security deed at the time of the proposed foreclosure had the authority to foreclose on the property in accordance with the security deed's power of sale. Assignment of the security deed did not diminish the instrument's powers under Georgia law. Stabb v. GMAC Mortg., LLC, F.3d (11th Cir. Aug. 21, 2014)(Unpublished).
Lower court correctly determined that the debtors lacked standing to challenge the assignment of the security deed to a bank because the security deed afforded the debtors no right to dispute the assignment as the debtors were not third-party beneficiaries of the assignment as a whole and were not intended to directly benefit from the transfer of the power of sale. Ames v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 298 Ga. 732, 783 S.E.2d 614 (2016).
Cited in Cummings v. Anderson, 173 Bankr. 959 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1994).
- 55 Am. Jur. 2d, Mortgages, §§ 1001, 1002, 1012 et seq.
- 59 C.J.S., Mortgages, §§ 319, 337, 346 et seq.
- Excessive security for debt as affecting question of fraud upon creditors, 138 A.L.R. 1051.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-03-07
Citation: 298 Ga. 732, 783 S.E.2d 614, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 210
Snippet: authorizes the assignment of security deeds. See OCGA § 44-14-64(c) ("Transfer of a deed to secure debt and the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-05-20
Citation: 293 Ga. 67, 743 S.E.2d 428, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1539, 2013 WL 2152562, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 454
Snippet: therein secured.” {Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 44-14-64 (b). This Code section further supports the conclusion