O.C.G.A. § 44-14-64 (2019)
Transfers of deeds to secure debt; execution; partial transfers; transfers by certain financial institutions; requirements for recording; payoff balance
(a) All transfers of deeds to secure debt shall be in writing; shall be signed by the grantee or, if the deed has been previously transferred, by the last transferee; and shall be witnessed as required for deeds. (b) Transfers of deeds to secure debt may be endorsed upon the original deed or by a separate instrument identifying the transfer and shall be sufficient to transfer the property therein described and the indebtedness therein secured, whether the indebtedness is evidenced by a note or other instrument or is an indebtedness which arises out of the terms or operation of the deed, together with the powers granted without specific mention thereof.
(c) Transfer of a deed to secure debt and the indebtedness therein secured may be made in whole or in part; provided, however, that, where the transfer is made in part, that portion of the deed and the indebtedness therein secured to be transferred shall be stated upon a separate instrument and not upon the original deed. (d) A transfer of a deed to secure debt and the indebtedness therein secured in whole or in part in accordance with subsections (a) through (c) of this Code section by a financial institution having deposits insured by an agency of the federal government or a transfer by a lender who regularly purchases or services residential real estate loans aggregating a minimum of $1 million secured by a first deed to secure debt encumbering real estate improved or to be improved by the construction thereon of one to four family dwelling units, where the transferor retains the right to service or supervise the servicing of the deed or interest therein, need not be recorded if: (1) The original deed to secure debt has been recorded; (2) An agreement in writing exists on or before the date of the transfer between the transferor and the transferee and sets forth the terms of the transfer and the interests of the parties thereto; and (3) Possession of the deed, the instrument of indebtedness, and the instrument of transfer is taken by such new transferee for himself or in his representative capacity or by a representative of such transferee which may include the transferor or any other transferee, provided that the agreement in paragraph (2) of this subsection provides for such party to take possession. (e) As described in subsection (d) of this Code section, the transfer by a financial institution or lender of a deed to secure debt and the indebtedness therein secured in whole or in part without recording in accordance with this Code section shall be effective to provide the new transferee with priority over all subsequent claims against the deed and the indebtedness therein secured to the extent of the interest so transferred, and the priority shall not be lessened by the fact that the transfer is not recorded; provided, however, that a transfer, satisfaction, cancellation, release, quitclaim deed, or modification executed and recorded by the holder of record of the deed to secure debt shall be effective to transfer, satisfy, cancel, release, quitclaim, or modify, as the case may be, all interest of the holder of record of the deed to secure debt and all interest of all transferees claiming by, through, or under the holder of record of the deed to secure debt. (f) Where the holder of the right to service or supervise the servicing of the transferred deed to secure debt and the indebtedness therein secured is a financial institution or lender as described in subsection (d) of this Code section, it shall have the same rights, responsibilities, and
obligations to act in all matters concerning the servicing, administration, and cancellation of the deed and indebtedness as to third parties as if no such transfer had taken place. (g) A transfer of a deed to secure debt shall not be recorded unless it includes the mailing address of the last transferee thereof. Failure to comply with this provision shall not be a defense to any foreclosure or grounds to set aside any foreclosure of any deed to secure debt. (h) A grantor or his transferee shall be entitled to receive without charge a payoff balance from the holder of a deed to secure debt on real property by requesting in writing said balance and providing a selfaddressed stamped envelope.
History
Code 1933, § 67-1305.1, enacted by Ga.
L. 1967, p. 737, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 976, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 859, § 2.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS A joint payee request did not constitute an assignment of FHA’s security deed for the reason that it did not identify such security deed and did not purport to be signed by the grantee. Washington Loan & Banking Co. v. Guin, 236 Ga. 779, 225 S.E.2d 318, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1024 (1976). Effect of transfer of deed to nominee of lender. - After Chapter 7 debtor executed a note to a lender and also executed a security deed to a grantee, as the lender’s nominee, to secure the debt, there was no separation of the note and security deed as a matter of law resulting from the transfer of the security deed. Drake v. Citizens Bank (In re Corley), 447 B.R. 375, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 807 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2011). Bad faith acted to lift automatic stay of bankruptcy. - Because a debtor filed a second bankruptcy petition for the express purpose of delaying and frustrating the legitimate efforts of a secured creditor to enforce its right of foreclosure, the debtor was found to have not acted in good faith under 11 U.S.C. § 362(g); thus, cause existed to annul or lift the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d). GRP Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Olsen (In re Olsen), No. 06-66198-MGD, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 614 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Jan. 8, 2007). Effect of transfer of deed from nominee to lender. - Foreclosure sale was valid because there was no defect in
the assignment of the power of sale from the nominee to the lender when the security deed did not lack any essential terms regarding the nominee’s role, rights, or duties under O.C.G.A. § 10-6-1 and no consideration was needed under O.C.G.A. § 44-14-64(a). The lender did not violate the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) by recording the sale post-petition because the Chapter 13 debtor retained no interest in the property after the sale. Bishop v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re Bishop), 470 B.R. 633, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 5123 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2011). Assignment of security deed. - Under O.C.G.A. §§ 23-2-114 and 44-14-64(b), the assignments of plaintiff homeowner’s security deed granted to defendant bank did not diminish the deed’s powers in the bank’s foreclosure action, thus, the homeowner’s wrongful foreclosure claim failed to state a claim for relief. Milani v. OneWest Bank FSB, 491 Fed. Appx. 977, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21559 (11th Cir. 2012). District court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s suit against multiple financial institutions and fictitious parties seeking declaratory and equitable relief to stop foreclosure proceedings as there was no dispute that the holder of the security deed at the time of the proposed foreclosure had the authority to foreclose on the property in accordance with the security deed’s power of sale. Assignment of the
security deed did not diminish the instrument’s powers under Georgia law. Stabb v. GMAC Mortg., LLC, 579 Fed. Appx. 706, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16081 (11th Cir. 2014). Lower court correctly determined that the debtors lacked standing to challenge the assignment of the security deed to a bank because the security deed afforded
the debtors no right to dispute the assignment as the debtors were not third-party beneficiaries of the assignment as a whole and were not intended to directly benefit from the transfer of the power of sale. Ames v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 298 Ga. 732, 783 S.E.2d 614, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 210 (2016).
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 55 Am. Jur. 2d, Mortgages, §§ 1001, 1002, 1012 et seq. C.J.S. 59 C.J.S., Mortgages, §§ 319, 337, 346 et seq.
ALR. Excessive security for debt as affecting question of fraud upon creditors, 138 A.L.R. 1051.