O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-12 (2019)

Rerecording lost or destroyed deeds and other instruments; validity

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the record of any deed or other recorded instrument or the certificate of record is lost or destroyed, the clerk of the superior court may rerecord the instrument and the certificate of record. The rerecording shall be as valid as the original recording and shall take effect from the date of the original recording, provided the rerecording is within 12 months after the loss or destruction of the original recording.

History

(Ga. L. 1882-83, p. 148, § 1; Civil Code 1895, § 3619; Civil Code 1910, § 4199; Code 1933, § 29-402.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Similar provisions regarding rerecording of instruments, § 24-5-24. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Constitutionality. - Attack on the constitutionality of this statute, on the ground that the Act from which this statute was codified

was broader than the Act’s title, was without merit. Ashburn v. Spirey, 112 Ga. 474, 37 S.E. 703 (1900) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-12).

rization for rerecorded deeds to have a date-back feature, no comparable authority exists for corrective deeds. Green Rivers Forest, Inc. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 200 Bankr. 956 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1996).

Retroactivity. - Statute has no retroactive effect upon deeds, the records of which were destroyed before the date of the statute’s enactment. Ashburn v. Spirey, 112 Ga. 474, 37 S.E. 703 (1900) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-12). No date-back feature for corrective deeds. - While O.C.G.A. § 44-2-12 provides autho-

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Records and Recording Laws, § 72.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2022 · leading case: Green Rivers Forest, Inc. v. Aetna Life Ins. (In re Green Rivers Forest, Inc.), 200 B.R. 956 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1996).
Green Rivers Forest, Inc. v. Aetna Life Ins. (In re Green Rivers Forest, Inc.), 200 B.R. 956 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1996). · cites it 12× “Specifically, GRF claims that O.C.G.A. § 44-2-12 entitled “Rerecording lost or destroyed deeds and other instruments; validity,” is the only Georgia Code section permitting a deed to be rerecorded, and that Aetna’s situation does not fall within its provisions.”
U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. of the Cabana Series IV Trust v. Carrington Mortg. Servs., LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 44-2-12 (providing for circumstances in which a deed may be re-recorded).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.