O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-5-176 (2019)

Effect on prescription of notice of instrument creating a lien

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Prescription shall not run against the owner or holder of a mortgage, a deed to secure debt, a bill of sale to secure debt, or any other instrument creating a lien on or conveying an interest in real or personal property as security for debt in favor of a person who has actual or constructive notice of such instrument.

History

(Ga. L. 1937, p. 755, § 1.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Statute cannot be given retroactive effect. Fraser v. Dolvin, 199 Ga. 638, 34 S.E.2d 875 (1945) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-5-176).

Legislative intent. - There is nothing in this statute indicating an intention by the legislature to deprive a party in possession of any right the party had already acquired, or that the possession which had been running and ripening into title before the date this statute became effective, should be lost. Fraser v. Dolvin, 199 Ga. 638, 34 S.E.2d 875 (1945) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-5-176).

Cited in Sweat v. Arline, 186 Ga. 460, 197 S.E. 893 (1938); Lankford v. Holton, 187 Ga. 94, 200 S.E. 243 (1938); Thomas v. Stedham, 208 Ga. 603, 68 S.E.2d 560 (1952); Reid v. Wilkerson, 222 Ga. 282, 149 S.E.2d 700 (1966).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 3 Am. Jur. 2d, Adverse Possession, §§ 12, 13, 15, 112 et seq., 169, 224 et seq. 264, 301.

C.J.S. - 2 C.J.S., Adverse Possession, § 208. 59 C.J.S., Mortgages, §§ 255, 695.

ALR. - Adverse possession by stranger as against mortgagee, 136 A.L.R. 782.

Adverse possession: mortgagee's possession before foreclosure as barring right of redemption, 7 A.L.R.2d 1131.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Vasko v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 204 (Fed. Cl. 2013).
Vasko v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 204 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “Ga.Code Ann. § 44-5-176 (2012). “ ‘[I]n the absence of fraud, a deed which, on its face, complies with all statutory requirements is entitled to be recorded, and once accepted and filed with the clerk of court for record, provides constructive notice to the world of its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.