Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The delivery of personal property by a parent into the exclusive possession of a child living separate from the parent creates a presumption of a gift to the child. This presumption may be rebutted by evidence of an actual contract of lending or by circumstances from which such a contract may be inferred.
(Orig. Code 1863, § 2621; Code 1868, § 2621; Code 1873, § 2663; Code 1882, § 2663; Civil Code 1895, § 3570; Civil Code 1910, § 4150; Code 1933, § 48-105.)
Statute applies only if there is a delivery, or if the donee is in actual possession. Lanier v. Holt, 18 Ga. App. 185, 89 S.E. 182 (1916). See also Hawkins v. Davie, 136 Ga. 550, 71 S.E. 873 (1911) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-5-84).
- When a father permits property to go home with his daughter, immediately upon her marriage or at any subsequent period, if he suffer it to remain there for a number of years, the presumption of law is that he intended it as a gift. Butler v. Hughes, 35 Ga. 200 (1866).
- Presumption that the law raises in favor of a gift, when made by a parent to a child, when the recipient is allowed to retain in the recipient's possession a chattel, is completely overcome and destroyed in the absence of other proof, by the declarations of such recipient, that the recipient held the chattel as a loan, and not as a gift - that the title to the property was in the parent. Culbreath v. Patton, 73 Ga. App. 667, 37 S.E.2d 719 (1946).
- Check from parents, who formed a limited partnership, given to their child for a large sum, was properly determined to have been a gift from the parents pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 44-5-80 and44-5-84, rather than a loan; the presumption under O.C.G.A. § 44-5-84, together with other supportive circumstantial evidence, including that there was no contract or lending and no repayment had been required, provided support for that factual finding. Baker v. Baker, 280 Ga. 299, 627 S.E.2d 26 (2006).
- Question whether money left with son-in-law was a loan to him or a gift to the daughter is a question of fact for the jury. Crawford v. Manson, 82 Ga. 118, 8 S.E. 54 (1888); Gross v. Higginbotham, 34 Ga. App. 549, 130 S.E. 371 (1925).
- Gift of property by a parent to a child after marriage, when the child is living alone, is prima facie an advancement. Holliday v. Wingfield, 59 Ga. 206 (1877).
Cited in Webb v. Blake, 31 Ga. App. 101, 119 S.E. 447 (1923); Jackson v. Moultrie Prod. Credit Ass'n, 76 Ga. App. 768, 47 S.E.2d 127 (1948); Paris v. Paris, 207 Ga. 341, 61 S.E.2d 491 (1950).
- 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Gifts, § 62.
- 38 C.J.S., Gifts, § 91.
- Right of child en ventre sa mere to take under a conveyance or devise of present interest to parent and children, 50 A.L.R. 619.
Gift of automobile, 100 A.L.R.2d 1219.
Unexplained gratuitous transfer of property from one relative to another as raising presumption of gift, 94 A.L.R.3d 608.
Issuance of stock certificate to joint tenants as creating gift inter vivos, 5 A.L.R.4th 373.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-02-27
Citation: 627 S.E.2d 26, 280 Ga. 299, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 577, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 155
Snippet: a presumption of a gift to the child." OCGA § 44-5-84. This presumption is applicable here even though