Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448At the term of the court when the application is made or at the next term after the partitioners have made their return, any of the persons against whose right or title a judgment is sought may file objections to the right of the applicant and the writ of partition or to the return of the partitioners, as the case may be, and may, by way of defense, show any good and probable matter in bar of the partition asked for or show that the petitioner does not have title to as much as is allowed and awarded to him by the partitioners or to any part of the land; in such event, the issue shall be tried by a jury as in cases of appeals to the superior court.
(Laws 1767, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 582; Code 1863, § 3901; Code 1868, § 3925; Code 1873, § 4001; Code 1882, § 4001; Civil Code 1895, § 4791; Civil Code 1910, § 5363; Code 1933, § 85-1509.)
Former Civil Code 1910, § 5363 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-165) had no application to the equitable partition provided for by former Civil Code 1910, § 5355 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-140). Drew v. Drew, 151 Ga. 11, 105 S.E. 469 (1921).
This statute provides that in a partition proceeding (at law) when title to the land is at issue, the issue shall be tried by a jury as in appeal cases. It is not applicable to an equitable partition. Gifford v. Courson, 224 Ga. 840, 165 S.E.2d 133 (1968) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-165).
- One at interest must be given a "reasonable time" after the filing of the application for partition in which to file objections. Bodrey v. Bodrey, 122 Ga. App. 23, 176 S.E.2d 234 (1970).
- Objections to an application for a partition or to the return of the partitioners may not be filed later than the term next after the partitioners have made their return. Cates v. Duncan, 181 Ga. 686, 183 S.E. 797 (1936).
Objections need not be under oath. Webb v. Till, 134 Ga. 388, 67 S.E. 1034 (1910).
- When an amended answer would have set up a valid defense, a want of an affidavit would be no cause for rejecting the answer. Mize v. Bank of Whigham, 138 Ga. 499, 75 S.E. 629 (1912).
- When an alleged tenant in common denies that the applicant is a cotenant, it is error for the court to order partition without joining issue. Douglas v. Johnson, 130 Ga. 472, 60 S.E. 1041 (1908).
- Even though an applicant may correctly set forth the applicant's own interest in the property which the applicant seeks to have sold for the purpose of partition, and even though the applicant names as a defendant another person, and correctly sets forth the interest in the property belonging to the applicant, the defendant may appear for the purpose of showing that another and different person, not named as a defendant, and not served, has an interest in the property, and that therefore the applicant is proceeding illegally. Hill v. McCandless, 198 Ga. 737, 32 S.E.2d 774 (1945).
- Defendant may caveat the return of the partitioners, and introduce evidence to show that a fair and equitable division of the land can be made by metes and bounds without ordering a sale. McCann v. Brown, 43 Ga. 386 (1871).
- This statute must be construed in harmony with the rule as to the conclusiveness of judgments, and will not authorize parties to file objections to the return of the partitioners on grounds which were adjudicated upon the hearing of the application for their appointment. Cates v. Duncan, 181 Ga. 686, 183 S.E. 797 (1936) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-165).
Judge may pass upon application without jury when sufficient matter in bar not set up. Brown v. Mooney, 108 Ga. 331, 33 S.E. 942 (1899).
- If the defendant has time, in the judgment of the court, to prepare and file defendant's objections, the trial should be at the term in which application is made; otherwise it should be tried at the next term thereafter. Lochrane v. Equitable Loan & Sec. Co., 122 Ga. 433, 50 S.E. 372 (1905).
When no objections were raised to hearing at time, judgment will not be reversed. Cock v. Callaway, 141 Ga. 774, 82 S.E. 286 (1914).
- Upon the trial of an issue as to title, evidence tending to show nondelivery of certain deeds is admissible without special pleading. Lowry v. Lowry, 150 Ga. 324, 103 S.E. 813 (1920).
Cited in Rodgers v. Price, 105 Ga. 67, 31 S.E. 126 (1898); Brown v. Tomberlin, 137 Ga. 596, 73 S.E. 947 (1912); Culver v. Pierce, 148 Ga. 300, 96 S.E. 497 (1918); Cates v. Duncan, 180 Ga. 289, 179 S.E. 121 (1935); Wren v. Wren, 199 Ga. 851, 36 S.E.2d 77 (1945); Armstrong v. Merts, 76 Ga. App. 465, 46 S.E.2d 529 (1948); Leggitt v. Allen, 85 Ga. App. 280, 69 S.E.2d 106 (1952); Goodman v. Georgia R.R. Bank & Trust Co., 221 Ga. 396, 144 S.E.2d 764 (1965); Shaw v. Davis, 119 Ga. App. 801, 168 S.E.2d 853 (1969); Lowe v. Lowe, 123 Ga. App. 525, 181 S.E.2d 715 (1971); Williams v. Williams, 159 Ga. App. 351, 283 S.E.2d 344 (1981); Clay v. Clay, 269 Ga. 902, 506 S.E.2d 866 (1998); Cheeves v. Lacksen, 273 Ga. 549, 544 S.E.2d 425 (2001).
- 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partition, §§ 57 et seq., 114.
- 68 C.J.S., Partition, § 259.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-06-02
Citation: 276 Ga. 651, 582 S.E.2d 1, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1688, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 546
Snippet: affirmed. All the Justices concur. See OCGA § 44-6-165. A planimeter is “an instrument for measuring
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-03-19
Citation: 273 Ga. 549, 544 S.E.2d 425
Snippet: which he claimed entitlement pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-165. 1. OCGA § 44-6-166.1 provides that its procedures
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-10-05
Citation: 269 Ga. 902, 506 S.E.2d 866
Snippet: jury trial for the reasons set forth in OCGA § 44-6-165, conducted a bench trial and made the return of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-05-12
Citation: 485 S.E.2d 205, 268 Ga. 40, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1624, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 175
Snippet: matter in bar of the petition" existed, OCGA § 44-6-165, thereby denying appellant a jury trial on his