Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 44-6-165 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 44 PROPERTY

Section 6. Estates, 44-6-1 through 44-6-206.

ARTICLE 7 TENANCY IN COMMON

44-6-165. Objections and defenses to right of applicant, writ, or return; jury trial.

At the term of the court when the application is made or at the next term after the partitioners have made their return, any of the persons against whose right or title a judgment is sought may file objections to the right of the applicant and the writ of partition or to the return of the partitioners, as the case may be, and may, by way of defense, show any good and probable matter in bar of the partition asked for or show that the petitioner does not have title to as much as is allowed and awarded to him by the partitioners or to any part of the land; in such event, the issue shall be tried by a jury as in cases of appeals to the superior court.

(Laws 1767, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 582; Code 1863, § 3901; Code 1868, § 3925; Code 1873, § 4001; Code 1882, § 4001; Civil Code 1895, § 4791; Civil Code 1910, § 5363; Code 1933, § 85-1509.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Former Civil Code 1910, § 5363 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-165) had no application to the equitable partition provided for by former Civil Code 1910, § 5355 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-140). Drew v. Drew, 151 Ga. 11, 105 S.E. 469 (1921).

This statute provides that in a partition proceeding (at law) when title to the land is at issue, the issue shall be tried by a jury as in appeal cases. It is not applicable to an equitable partition. Gifford v. Courson, 224 Ga. 840, 165 S.E.2d 133 (1968) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-165).

Interested party must be given "reasonable time" to file objections.

- One at interest must be given a "reasonable time" after the filing of the application for partition in which to file objections. Bodrey v. Bodrey, 122 Ga. App. 23, 176 S.E.2d 234 (1970).

Objections cannot be filed later than next court term.

- Objections to an application for a partition or to the return of the partitioners may not be filed later than the term next after the partitioners have made their return. Cates v. Duncan, 181 Ga. 686, 183 S.E. 797 (1936).

Objections need not be under oath. Webb v. Till, 134 Ga. 388, 67 S.E. 1034 (1910).

Want of affidavit no cause for rejection.

- When an amended answer would have set up a valid defense, a want of an affidavit would be no cause for rejecting the answer. Mize v. Bank of Whigham, 138 Ga. 499, 75 S.E. 629 (1912).

Defendant may deny applicant's title.

- When an alleged tenant in common denies that the applicant is a cotenant, it is error for the court to order partition without joining issue. Douglas v. Johnson, 130 Ga. 472, 60 S.E. 1041 (1908).

Defendant may show that another person, not named and served, has interest in property.

- Even though an applicant may correctly set forth the applicant's own interest in the property which the applicant seeks to have sold for the purpose of partition, and even though the applicant names as a defendant another person, and correctly sets forth the interest in the property belonging to the applicant, the defendant may appear for the purpose of showing that another and different person, not named as a defendant, and not served, has an interest in the property, and that therefore the applicant is proceeding illegally. Hill v. McCandless, 198 Ga. 737, 32 S.E.2d 774 (1945).

Defense may show that equitable division can be made without sale.

- Defendant may caveat the return of the partitioners, and introduce evidence to show that a fair and equitable division of the land can be made by metes and bounds without ordering a sale. McCann v. Brown, 43 Ga. 386 (1871).

Objections on grounds previously adjudicated not authorized.

- This statute must be construed in harmony with the rule as to the conclusiveness of judgments, and will not authorize parties to file objections to the return of the partitioners on grounds which were adjudicated upon the hearing of the application for their appointment. Cates v. Duncan, 181 Ga. 686, 183 S.E. 797 (1936) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-165).

Judge may pass upon application without jury when sufficient matter in bar not set up. Brown v. Mooney, 108 Ga. 331, 33 S.E. 942 (1899).

Time for trial discretionary.

- If the defendant has time, in the judgment of the court, to prepare and file defendant's objections, the trial should be at the term in which application is made; otherwise it should be tried at the next term thereafter. Lochrane v. Equitable Loan & Sec. Co., 122 Ga. 433, 50 S.E. 372 (1905).

When no objections were raised to hearing at time, judgment will not be reversed. Cock v. Callaway, 141 Ga. 774, 82 S.E. 286 (1914).

Evidence showing nondelivery of deeds admissible without special pleading.

- Upon the trial of an issue as to title, evidence tending to show nondelivery of certain deeds is admissible without special pleading. Lowry v. Lowry, 150 Ga. 324, 103 S.E. 813 (1920).

Cited in Rodgers v. Price, 105 Ga. 67, 31 S.E. 126 (1898); Brown v. Tomberlin, 137 Ga. 596, 73 S.E. 947 (1912); Culver v. Pierce, 148 Ga. 300, 96 S.E. 497 (1918); Cates v. Duncan, 180 Ga. 289, 179 S.E. 121 (1935); Wren v. Wren, 199 Ga. 851, 36 S.E.2d 77 (1945); Armstrong v. Merts, 76 Ga. App. 465, 46 S.E.2d 529 (1948); Leggitt v. Allen, 85 Ga. App. 280, 69 S.E.2d 106 (1952); Goodman v. Georgia R.R. Bank & Trust Co., 221 Ga. 396, 144 S.E.2d 764 (1965); Shaw v. Davis, 119 Ga. App. 801, 168 S.E.2d 853 (1969); Lowe v. Lowe, 123 Ga. App. 525, 181 S.E.2d 715 (1971); Williams v. Williams, 159 Ga. App. 351, 283 S.E.2d 344 (1981); Clay v. Clay, 269 Ga. 902, 506 S.E.2d 866 (1998); Cheeves v. Lacksen, 273 Ga. 549, 544 S.E.2d 425 (2001).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partition, §§ 57 et seq., 114.

C.J.S.

- 68 C.J.S., Partition, § 259.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 44-6-165 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 4

Williams v. Conerly

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-06-02

Citation: 276 Ga. 651, 582 S.E.2d 1, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1688, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 546

Snippet: affirmed. All the Justices concur. See OCGA § 44-6-165. A planimeter is “an instrument for measuring

Cheeves v. Lacksen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-03-19

Citation: 273 Ga. 549, 544 S.E.2d 425

Snippet: which he claimed entitlement pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-165. 1. OCGA § 44-6-166.1 provides that its procedures

Clay v. Clay

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-10-05

Citation: 269 Ga. 902, 506 S.E.2d 866

Snippet: jury trial for the reasons set forth in OCGA § 44-6-165, conducted a bench trial and made the return of

Clay v. Clay

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-05-12

Citation: 485 S.E.2d 205, 268 Ga. 40, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1624, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 175

Snippet: matter in bar of the petition" existed, OCGA § 44-6-165, thereby denying appellant a jury trial on his