Vargo v. Adams

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-10-02

Citation: 302 Ga. 637, 805 S.E.2d 817

Snippet: equitable partition is also unavailable. OCGA § 44-6-140 states: “Equity has jurisdiction in cases of partition

Bagwell v. Trammel

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-10-05

Citation: 297 Ga. 873, 778 S.E.2d 173, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 671

Snippet: Redemption Agreement, an equitable partitioning, OCGA § 44-6-140, and specific performance ofthe Redemption Agreement

Mallard v. Mallard

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-01

Snippet: equitable partitioning principles pursuant to OCGA § 44-6- 140, “if the circumstances of the case warrant the

Mallard v. Mallard

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-01

Citation: 297 Ga. 274, 773 S.E.2d 274, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 371

Snippet: equitable partitioning principles pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-140, “if the circumstances of the case warrant the

Pack v. Mahan

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24

Citation: 294 Ga. 496, 755 S.E.2d 126, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 272, 2014 WL 695173, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 112

Snippet: distinguishes between “equitable” partition, OCGA § 44-6-140 et seq., and “statutory” partition, OCGA § 44-6-160

Robinson v. Baker

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-01

Citation: 702 S.E.2d 165, 288 Ga. 135, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3475, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 827

Snippet: of her petition—equitable partitioning, OCGA § 44-6-140 et seq. In fact, the body of the petition states

Ononye v. Ezeofor

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-05-17

Citation: 695 S.E.2d 234, 287 Ga. 201, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1615, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 394

Snippet: statutory and equitable partition actions. See OCGA § 44-6-140 et seq. (equitable partitioning); OCGA § 44-6-160

Ransom v. Holman

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-02-07

Citation: 608 S.E.2d 600, 279 Ga. 63, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 350, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 108

Snippet: affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] OCGA § 44-6-140. [2] Coker Properties., L.P. v. Brooks, 278 Ga

Coker Properties, L.P. v. Brooks

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-10-25

Citation: 604 S.E.2d 766, 278 Ga. 638

Snippet: proceeding as an equitable partitioning under OCGA § 44-6-140 et seq. due to the circumstances of the case.

Chaney v. Upchurch

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-09-27

Citation: 278 Ga. 515, 603 S.E.2d 255, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3124, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 808

Snippet: complaint for partition in equity pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-140 et seq., seeking a public sale and division of

Reece v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-02-24

Citation: 577 S.E.2d 583, 276 Ga. 404, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 165

Snippet: also sought an equitable partition under OCGA § 44-6-140. [3] We need not address the other issues Reece

Cheeves v. Lacksen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-03-19

Citation: 273 Ga. 549, 544 S.E.2d 425

Snippet: ” which is the standard established by OCGA § 44-6-140 for determining whether a partitioning should

Young v. Young

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-10-18

Citation: 271 Ga. 568, 522 S.E.2d 455, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 3790, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 791

Snippet: appellees. The partitioning was sought under OCGA § 44-6-140, the equitable partitioning statute. Whether the

Lathem v. Hestley

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-03-15

Citation: 514 S.E.2d 440, 270 Ga. 849

Snippet: § 44-6-160, or equitable partition, see OCGA § 44-6-140.3 Inasmuch as Lathem’s petition did not fail to

Walker v. Walker

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-03-15

Citation: 467 S.E.2d 583, 266 Ga. 414, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1025, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 124

Snippet: for equitable partitioning under OCGA § 44-6-140. Under § 44-6-140, attorney fees may be charged out of

Byse v. Lewis

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-11-19

Citation: 400 S.E.2d 618, 260 Ga. 551

Snippet: method of partitioning under OCGA §§ 44-6-160 and 44-6-140. If the parties hereto cannot do one of the first

Stone v. Benton

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-09-28

Citation: 371 S.E.2d 864, 258 Ga. 539, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 387

Snippet: and can pursue an equitable remedy under OCGA § 44-6-140. Before the legislature passed OCGA § 44-6-166

Lassiter Properties, Inc. v. Gresham

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-09-14

Citation: 258 Ga. 500, 371 S.E.2d 650, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 371

Snippet: proceeding into an equitable partitioning under OCGA § 44-6-140. The trial court denied this motion on March 11