Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 61-309, enacted by Ga. L. 1970, p. 968, § 6; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1380, § 1.)
- General Assembly in giving tenants the right to remain in possession during the pendency of a dispossessory proceeding by tendering the payment of rent into court intended "rent" to mean "money." Lipshutz v. Shantha, 144 Ga. App. 196, 240 S.E.2d 738 (1977).
Even though Georgia courts have held that dispossessory actions were not civil actions, a dispossessory action filed by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation was properly removed to federal court under a Weems analysis since: (1) dispossessory actions were tried before a magistrate court, which was a regular judicial tribunal and required notice and service; (2) a dispossessory action was comparable to a civil trial if the tenant answered under O.C.G.A. § 44-7-53(b): and (3) rent was an issue of pecuniary value in a dispossessory action under O.C.G.A. §§ 44-7-52(a),44-7-53(b), and44-7-54. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Matassino, 911 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2012).
- Although the defendant tenant tendered all rent due within seven days after service, but failed to tender the amount of the cost of the dispossessory warrant, the defendant did not have a complete defense so as to bar the action. Terrell v. Griffith, 129 Ga. App. 675, 200 S.E.2d 485 (1973).
- Housing authority was not required to accept a tenant's tender of rent and the cost of dispossessory warrant made in response to the authority's second dispossessory warrant issued within a 12-month period. Housing Auth. v. Jackson, 216 Ga. App. 51, 453 S.E.2d 60 (1994).
- Fact that the tenant had been delinquent in rental payments during two prior months, which failures to pay had generated termination notices not followed through by the landlord, who accepted late rental payments on those occasions, did not constitute an estoppel which would require the landlord to accept late rent after termination notices on subsequent occasions. Baker v. Housing Auth., 152 Ga. App. 64, 262 S.E.2d 183 (1979).
- Termination notice obviously indicates an intention to rely on the exact terms of the agreement. Baker v. Housing Auth., 152 Ga. App. 644, 262 S.E.2d 183 (1979).
- Landlord was entitled to rely on default provisions of lease of residence for commercial purposes in refusing tender of past due rent and in taking action to dispossess appellant, and appellant was not entitled to defenses of O.C.G.A. § 44-7-50 et seq., having waived those provisions in the lease. Eason Publications, Inc. v. Monson, 163 Ga. App. 370, 294 S.E.2d 585 (1982).
- Fact that the appellant had made out an affirmative defense as to payment of rent, and that the evidence showed the rent was paid, avails the appellant nothing when the issue was not raised at trial as a defense and no disposition, verdict, or judgment was sought on its account. A motion for a new trial on the grounds of payment of rent is not an available remedy to a dispossessory action since the plea of "complete defense" as a matter of law goes to the judgment only and not the verdict. Able-Craft, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 167 Ga. App. 725, 307 S.E.2d 671 (1983).
Cited in West Court Square v. Assayag, 131 Ga. App. 690, 206 S.E.2d 579 (1974); Minit Chek Food Stores, Inc. v. Plaza Capital, Inc., 135 Ga. App. 110, 217 S.E.2d 415 (1975); C & A Land Co. v. Rudolf Inv. Corp., 163 Ga. App. 832, 296 S.E.2d 149 (1982); Greenhill v. Allen, 181 Ga. App. 532, 352 S.E.2d 845 (1987).
- 49 Am. Jur. 2d, Landlord and Tenant, § 950.
- 52A C.J.S., Landlord and Tenant, § 1376 et seq.
- Power of equity to relieve against forfeiture of lease for nonpayment of rent, 16 A.L.R. 437.
Demand of rent due as prerequisite of enforcement of forfeiture or termination of lease providing for termination for nonpayment, 28 A.L.R.2d 803; 31 A.L.R.4th 1254.
Relief against forfeiture of lease for nonpayment of rent, 31 A.L.R.2d 321.
No results found for Georgia Code 44-7-52.