O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 45-17-19 (2019)

Authenticity of official signature and term of office; fees; apostille

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The authenticity of the official signature and term of office of a notary public may be evidenced by: (1) A certificate of authority from the appointing clerk of superior court or the Georgia Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative Authority; or (2) An apostille in the exact form prescribed by the Hague Convention from the Secretary of State, provided that an apostille shall be obtained only from the Georgia Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative Authority on or after the thirtieth day following the designation, by the United States Department of State, of the Georgia Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative Authority as an authority in the United States competent to issue an apostille. (b) The fee for a certificate of authority shall be $2.00. The fee for an apostille shall be $3.00. (c) An apostille as specified by the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents shall be attached to any document requiring authentication that is bound for a nation that has signed and ratified the Hague Convention.

History

(Code 1981, § 45-17-19, enacted by Ga. L. 1984, p. 1105, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 673, § 2.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Bargar, Chapter 7 Tr. for the Est. of David v. Rocket Mortg., LLC f/k/a Quicken Loans, LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2025).
Bargar, Chapter 7 Tr. for the Est. of David v. Rocket Mortg., LLC f/k/a Quicken Loans, LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2025). · cites it 5× “In the Summary Judgment Order, the Court found its interpretation of the Exact Name requirement to be consistent with O.C.G.A. § 45-17-19(a)(1), which provides that “[t]he authenticity of the official signature … of a notary public may be evidenced by: (1) A certificate of…”
— 45-17-19(a)(1) — 1 case
Bargar, Chapter 7 Tr. for the Est. of David v. Rocket Mortg., LLC f/k/a Quicken Loans, LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2025). “In the Summary Judgment Order, the Court found its interpretation of the Exact Name requirement to be consistent with O.C.G.A. § 45-17-19(a)(1), which provides that “[t]he authenticity of the official signature … of a notary public may be evidenced by: (1) A certificate of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.